Skip to main content

This will be short as I have the flu today, but Sarah Weddington had a tweet I followed a few mins ago to this: http://www.dailytoreador.com/...

For those who don't want to read, as we know, the Fifth Circuit Court upheld the laws in Texas restricting abortion access for women.

These restrictions, according to an Associated Press article, caused the closure of 20 clinics across the state of Texas, require abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals and limit the prescription of pills that induce abortions.
Senator Wendy David, filibustered the original bill for 11 hours and when push came to shove, Gov. Perry decided to call another special session just to pass these arcane TRAP laws.

Could there be light at the end of the tunnel however? According to the article, at least on Supreme Court justice thinks so:

Stephen Breyer, a Supreme Court justice, said in a news release it is likely this case will end up before the Supreme Court and they will have the final ruling.

“It is a question, I believe,” he said, “that at least four members of this court will wish to consider irrespective of the Fifth Circuit’s ultimate decision.”

I'm hoping that our SCOTUS isn't so conservative at this point that it would totally overthrow Roe v. Wade, and if it upholds Roe v. Wade in a decision, that would set back the pro-birthers for a few more decades at least.

Originally posted to LeftieIndie on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 11:39 AM PDT.

Also republished by Feminism, Pro-Feminism, Womanism: Feminist Issues, Ideas, & Activism.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (21+ / 0-)

    It is every person's obligation to put back into the world at least the equivalent of what they takes out of it. - Albert Einstein (edited for modern times to include everyone by me!)

    by LeftieIndie on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 11:39:45 AM PDT

  •  Isn't It Unusual for a NonScalaia Justice (5+ / 0-)

    to comment on a specific case they might be hearing?

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 11:48:03 AM PDT

  •  Slight nit-pick on some otherwise good news (3+ / 0-)

    It's "pro-FORCED-birthers", not "pro-birthers". Remember, the Catholic Church opposes in-vitro fertilization. Everything, for the celibate males who run the show, has to be at the will of YHWH, not the humans involved, so infertile couples just have to suffer -- and turn to Holy Mother Church with their wallets open to feel better about it. Also, the Fundies tend to think of those who support a woman's right to make her own decisions about whether and/or when to reproduce as only supporting the decision to terminate a pregnancy. They don't understand that we support women, whatever the choice, and don't abandon them to go it alone once they decide.

    But, good. While we know how Scalia-Thomas-Alito-Roberts will go, Kenendy is still up in the air. This may be a bridge too far, even for him.

    Radarlady

  •  Remeber that the Court is an institution (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BleacherBum153

    It is going to want to uphold the principles and traditions of that institutions.  It is part of its nature.

    This means that even with a conservative majority it is unlikely to overturn previous court decisions without a compelling reason to do so.  That includes Roe v. Wade.  Instead, I would wager that they would find a way to issue a "narrow" ruling on a case that is inline with their views.  

    "It's not surveillance, it's data collection to keep you safe"

    by blackhand on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 12:24:07 PM PDT

  •  Remember John Robert's confirmation hearings? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Penny GC

    Anytime a Democrat brought up Roe v Wade he would just say "It's settled law." Didn't exactly say he wouldn't repeal it, just kept saying "It's settled law." We will see how settled it is, I guess.

    "That being said, I do agree I am going to hell. But for other reasons. Mostly boring tax stuff ' Amy Pohler

    by Annie B on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 12:56:49 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site