Skip to main content

As I was finishing an edition of the Overnight News Digest, I saw an opportunity for a thought experiment for myself. I don't really consider myself to be any kind of journalist. I struggle to understand how well executed journalism is accomplished and I deeply admire those people who provide us with it. But I try to grasp the fundamentals as best I can. I suppose I would call myself a compiler or an aggregator. (I am but your humble scribe.) However, in some of the compilations I can begin to see how I might utilize words and images from different sources which could then be put together in ways that might produce an additional narrative.  

One of the articles I included was a scientific examination of the relationship of the perceived focus of the eyes of a cartoon character on a box of cereal and whether or not that character was able to convey a  "higher connection [to] or higher level of trust for the brand".

A second article (which is a compilation of two other news articles) concerns a young woman who was arrested for leaving her children in her car while she applied for a job and a man who was arrested for sexually assaulting his 3 year old daughter. At the beginning of the article, there are side-by-side comparisons of their mug shots.

I looked at those two photographs. I looked long and hard at those two people. I tried not to think of the stories behind them. (Either one of them is heartbreaking, although for different reasons.) I looked most closely at their eyes, the so called "windows to the soul".
In his picture, the man is looking directly at the camera. He has a small smile. His hair is in place but uncombed. He appears relaxed... casual. He is white.
In her picture, the woman is looking up and away to one side. Tears are running down her face, down under her chin where they meet and run down her chest. Her mouth is set to stifle a sob. Her hair is a tangled mess. She appears to be in an agony I can not imagine. She is black.
And yet...
If I had only those photos to look at and I had to try to assess who those people were and how they came to have had these pictures made, which of them would I have a "higher connection [to] or higher level of trust for...".
So I stopped to think.
Is some part of my assessment of this article about them going to be based on eye contact and general demeanor? If so, has the journalist who wrote the article, either by inadvertence or intent, biased my feelings toward them? I realize the journalist may have had few (if any) choices when it came to a selection of pictures. I also realize the power of a word or an image to convey an idea. I have asked myself if the journalist has pushed my perceptions of these people one way or another. Did I buy into it? Does this change how I feel? What should I think now? What can I learn?

The thing is...
I do know something about these two people.
I do know something about their respective problems.

I look them in the eyes. They are not cartoon characters trying to sell me a product.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site