Skip to main content

Pete Campbell (Vincent Kartheiser) and Bonnie Whiteside (Jessy Schram) (Photo by Jordin Althaus/AMC)
Look at those two, smiling in sunny California. Because they appear to be the only happy people in our Mad Men universe right now.

In March 1960, when the series started, everyone at Sterling Cooper seemed pretty happy—Don Draper as a successful creative leader with a manageable social life, Roger Sterling laughing through life, Joan Holloway as queen of the nest, Pete Campbell having a limitless future in business and an imminent wedding, and Peggy Olsen, new to the firm and full of pluck.

Welcome to January 1969. Join us below the fold.

Don is dissolute, lonely, unemployed (or "on leave"), without his mojo, and reduced to making ad pitches with Freddy Rumsen as his sockpuppet.

Roger's finding out that sybaritism can get a little unfulfilling after a decade. (Also, where's your pants, dude?)

Joan may have moved up from office manager to partner, but no one still seems to respect her intellect and business brains.

And Peggy is despairing, missing the work-devils-she-knew in Don and Ted, and stuck with some real pain-in-the-ass tenants who don't know what the toilet's not for.

But Pete? Seems California is the place Punchable Pete Campbell oughtta be, having adjusted well to the land of orange groves, cole slaw on deli sandwiches, and mediocre bagels. Who knew?

One can never say on this show that a character has "reached bottom," because we don't know how far down the bottom can get. Todd VanDerWerff, The AV Club:

Peggy asks [Stan] if he’s tired of doing terrible work, if he might not want to go back to doing things that are challenging and rewarding. But Sterling Cooper & Partners is no longer at a place where it wants to do that. It’s gotten big, and now it needs to protect the territory it’s acquired. Meaningful work is out of the question.

That’s another death knell for someone like Peggy or Don. Both of them define themselves through their work all too often, and if that work is taken away from them or eroded of meaning, they’re stuck in a world where all they can think about is how little meaning life has outside of the meaning you construct for yourself. But even that meaning collapses in the face of despair or sorrow or death. Without work to give them meaning, without each other to bounce off of, what do Don and Peggy have left? Only the knowledge that they, too, will die, and that much of their lives have been hollow attempts to fill that void. Welcome back, Mad Men, you old day brightener, you.

Matt Zoller Seitz, Vulture:
Patriarchal entitlement hangs over this episode like brown Los Angeles smog. Lou Avery talks to Peggy, an award-winning senior copy editor, as if she were a “bossy” intern who needed to be smacked down. “I guess I’m just immune to your charms, Peggy,” he tells her before showing her his back, as if Peggy gave a fiftieth of a damn about being charming. We see Megan endure a smarmy, show business version of this gender-based hazing. Her producer speaks of her solely as a commodity and refers to her as a “girl” four times, at one point compounding the indignity by prefacing “girl” with “this”, addressing Don as if Megan weren’t sitting next to him. And as wrung out and beaten down as he is, Don behaves with sexist arrogance too, carving out psychological space in Megan’s life by ordering the delivery of a huge color TV without asking her first. For the inroads these women have made, men still treat them as girls.
Willa Paskin, Slate:
As for that scene with Neve Campbell: I'm afraid that my bullshit meter started ringing right about the time she confessed that her husband “died of thirst,” one of those Please, take out your highlighter and identify the big theme in the text bits of dialogue Matthew Weiner sometimes can't stop himself from writing. (See also: the very last scene with Don literally out in the cold.) Don too is dreadfully, dangerously thirsty, not just for alcohol but for something, anything sustaining, even if he's, thankfully, done looking for it in the bottom or a bottle or someone else's bed. (For now.) If this episode was at all predictive, we're not quite done slogging it out with Don and his issues just yet.
Emily Nussbaum, The New Yorker:
A few years ago, I came to the realization that most of the TV shows I was interested in that particular season were either very fast shows, like “Scandal,” or very slow ones, like “Top of the Lake.” We all know what category “Mad Men” falls in, and it’s easy to take for granted how revolutionary that slowness has been for the entire medium. The show’s strength is still the way it relishes lingering and withholding, pausing and fetishizing, forcing the audience to gaze at endlessly interpretable images, like that final one of Don caught in the prison bars of his own broken sliding door. Yet, for all its languorous pacing, it’s surprisingly hard to predict. Still, this episode did follow one “Mad Men” tradition, the formula that originated with its pilot. In that opening episode, Don’s marriage was revealed only in the final scene; in last year’s opening episode, set in Hawaii, Don’s affair was the jack-in-the-box that got exposed in the end. In last night’s episode, the reveal was that he’d been doing secret account work for Freddie, which I suppose makes his advertising brainstorms into his latest secret life. And who would Don Draper be without a secret life?

Originally posted to Adam B on Mon Apr 14, 2014 at 11:57 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site