Skip to main content

Judge McShane scheduled the Oregon marriage equality hearing on January 23, 2014 (oral arguments) for April 23, 2014. Oregon's Attorney General decided not to defend the marriage ban. No other party came forward to defend it until NOM decided to try and intervene -- TWO days before the hearing. That's right -- two freaking days before the hearing (oral arguments for summary judgment). If that wasn't galling enough, the very next day, NOM filed a motion to postpone the hearing (the DAY BEFORE the hearing). Judge McShane rightly denied the motion to postpone the hearing, however he stated in the order that he would not rule on the motion for summary judgment before he decided on NOM's motion to intervene. Judge McShane will hold oral arguments on the motion to intervene on May 14, 2014. The oral arguments for summary judgment went on as planned.

NOM's Chairman, John Eastman, made this statement regarding the hearing that took place on April 23:

What is occurring in Oregon is the plaintiffs are colluding with the government to get a pre-ordained result that fits with their political agenda notwithstanding the fact that the voters of Oregon voted overwhelmingly to define marriage as one man and one woman. Judge Michael McShane held a hearing in Oregon yesterday where everybody participating--two sets of plaintiffs and two sets of Defendants, including the Governor and the Attorney General, all argued that Oregon's marriage law served no rational purpose. Attorneys for the government announced that they could not even conceive of any argument in favor of marriage between one man and one woman. The hearing highlighted in a profound way the importance to our adversary process of actually having adversaries.
via Joe.My.God

Actually, the hearing highlighted that, in some cases, it is getting extremely hard to find anyone to defend these discriminatory marriage bans. If a law violates the US Constitution, it MUST be struck down. It does not matter how many (misinformed) people voted for it. And, it does not matter how many times and how often NOM and their spokespersons whine about it. That is the way our government (and our judiciary) work. If justice prevails, Judge McShane will deny NOM's motion to intervene and strike down Oregon's marriage ban sooner rather than later.

Originally posted to librarisingnsf on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 12:02 PM PDT.

Also republished by Kossacks for Marriage Equality.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site