Skip to main content

"I hope you take the job. Change happens one person at a time."
Earlier in the week I reviewed HBO's Veep, and it's a nice contrast to this series. Both are comedies centered on female leads in a cast of quirky characters working in government and having to deal with a fickle public. But where HBO's Veep finds its comedy in cynicism, NBC's Parks and Recreation is probably the most positive show about government and politics on television and gets laughs from its Pollyannaish optimism.

Set in fictional Pawnee, Indiana, the series follows Leslie Knope (Amy Poehler) as she begins her rise in government and leads a quixotic quest to improve her town from Leslie's job in the Parks Department. And more often than not, Leslie and the ragtag bunch of misfits on her staff find a way to do it. The series has been called the "most progressive show" on television, and the Leslie Knope character has been cited as a positive feminist role model for depicting women in politics. The character's pregnancy this season has been the source of some debate over how women and pregnancy are depicted in television sitcoms.

For last night's sixth season finale, First Lady Michelle Obama stopped by to give Leslie some advice. And by the end of the episode, the series had undergone a major shift.

"If I seem too passionate, it’s because I care. If I come on strong, it’s because I feel strongly, and if I push too hard, it’s because things aren’t moving fast enough. This is my home, you are my family, and I promise you, I’m not going anywhere." —Leslie Knope
Aziz Ansari as Tom Haverford, Aubrey Plaza as April Ludgate, Chris Pratt as Andy Dwyer, Retta as Donna Meagle, Jim O'Heir as Jerry Gergich, Amy Poehler as Leslie Knope, Adam Scott as Ben Wyatt
Parks and Recreation was originally conceived as a spin-off of The Office, since it was created by some of the same people behind that show, and uses the same "mockumentary" format. In season one, Leslie Knope is basically a female version of Michael Scott (Steve Carell) in the public sector. But beyond season one, the show retooled, grounded Amy Poehler's character, and infused the series with elements from The Simpsons, with former Simpsons staff members Greg Daniels and Mike Scully having been writers and producers on Parks and Recreation. Both shows have built important secondary characters that populate Springfield (Apu, Ned Flanders, Mrs. Krabappel, Mr. Burns, etc.) and Pawnee (Joan Calamezzo, Perd Hapley, Warren, Jean-Ralphio, the Tammys, etc.) that gives you a real sense of community. Also, the tone of optimism can even be heard in the series theme song, which is one of the happiest tunes I've every heard, and makes you want to go conquer the day.

This season of the show has seen the fourth marriage of Ron "Fucking" Swanson (Nick Offerman), the departure of Chris (Rob Lowe) and Ann (Rashida Jones), the pregnancy of Leslie, as well as the merger of Pawnee and Eagleton (i.e. think Springfield and Shelbyville merging on The Simpsons) and the political blowback Leslie suffered because of it.

The season six finale, titled "Moving Up," could have been a series finale, and truth be told there's not much in terms of plot. Everything is held together by mostly vignettes, where Tom opens a restaurant, the town holds a concert, and Leslie makes a decision about her future and the future of her family. But during those moments, a lot of the storylines for the characters get tied off and exemplify how far they've come. Ron's happiness in his marriage to Diane (Lucy Lawless) has made him comfortable enough to appear to his friends as "Duke Silver," as well as resist the charms of Tammy 2 (Offerman's wife Megan Mullally). And Ron, who began the series as a Libertarian that distrusted government, has come a little bit in Leslie's direction. Andy is reunited and performs with Mouse Rat through the actions of his loving and caring wife April. Tom may or may not have a future as a successful restaurateur because his friends are there to support him. Ben has created and holds the copyright to a popular board game. And Leslie moves on to work for the National Park Service, and the Unity Concert, with help from Ginuwine, the Decemberists and Yo La Tengo, is an example of how Pawnee is a better place because of her work.

5,000 Candles In The Wind
But then, in the final moments, things took a shift.
  • Three years later: In an interview with Alan Sepinwall, showrunner Mike Schur has said the time-jump ending was inspired by the season two finale of Battlestar Galactica. Leslie has a new haircut in her position as regional director. This move effectively allows the show to skip over the baby years of the triplets (revealed to be two boys and one girl). The show created a cheat by conveniently finding space on the third floor, and conveniently Leslie's boss at NPS is willing to relocate operations from Chicago to Pawnee. But the series had to do that since they had written themselves into a corner. If Leslie had turned down the job to stay where she was in Pawnee's parks department, it would have seemed like a betrayal of the character's goals. But there's no way she can leave Pawnee and it stay the same series. Going back to the example of The Simpsons, Leslie without Pawnee would be like Homer, Bart and the family without Springfield.
From Dan Snierson's interview with showrunner Mike Schur at Entertainment Weekly:
How did you settle on three years? Did you toy around with smaller time jumps or even more radical jumps?

Mike Schur: We talked about a bunch of different scenarios. One of them was nine months, so she’d had the kids, and we sped through the entire pregnancy and birth and the first week at home and all of that stuff. And then it was like, “If you’re going to jump nine months or a year, do something that really suggests that a lot of stuff had happened.” There’s something about that period of time: The kids are walking around and they’re wearing kid clothes and they’re maybe in pre-school at this point. It seemed like the right amount of time. It was a gut-level thing. We talked about: Is it five years? Is it 10 years? It seemed like enough time to be for really radical change without everybody having gray hair.

I’m guessing the series finale will be like Six Feet Under and we’ll jump decades ahead and see everyone’s death? Can’t wait to see how Jerry dies!

Mike Schur:When Garry dies, who’s now Terry, he’s going to die peacefully in his sleep at the age of 110, with Gayle, who is still alive.

And hot.

Mike Schur: And hot. And his three children and his 16 grandchildren and his 34 great-grandchildren, and they’re going to be peacefully singing his favorite song and she clutches a picture of Li’l Sebastian and drifts peacefully into the afterlife. Somehow he’s going to outlive them all and he’s going to be the happiest when he goes.

  • What we know about the future: Ben and Leslie are still together. Andy and April are still together. And Jerry, Larry, Gary, Terry is working for Leslie. Beyond that is anyone's guess. Are Ron and Dianne still together? Did Tom's restaurant work out? Will Donna settle down with Joe? Although, we do know that between this and Mad Men, Jon Hamm's characters are having a really tough time finding steady employment.
The most incompetent employee that's ever worked for Leslie
  • The issue of triplets: Before the season finale aired, there had been some criticism of how the show had treated Leslie's pregnancy. In the previous episode, “One In 8,000,” Ben and Leslie find out they're having triplets. Ben starts freaking out when he realizes the costs and trials ahead with having three babies. Leslie calms him down by saying "everything that we have been through ... all of it has just been preparation for this." Libby Hill wrote an essay where she argued it betrayed the character's feminist goals to condense everything she's done to preparation for motherhood, and indicative of how female characters on television always need to have a child in order to feel that their life is "fulfilled." However, the three-year time-jump shows Leslie still as active as ever in government decision making, while being a mom too. Alyssa Rosenberg has written a column calling the depiction of Leslie in the time-jump a "bold, feminist leap forward." Instead of presenting a dichotomy of mother and professional, the show doesn't even entertain the conversation since it's a false choice. Leslie is both mother and professional, even with triplets.
  • The First Lady: The episode begins with Leslie, Ben and Andy taking a trip to San Francisco. This allows Michelle Obama to seal the deal in persuading Leslie to take the job as regional director at the National Parks Service. The cameo also allows the First Lady to promote her "Let’s Move!" initiative.
From Alasdair Wilkins at the A.V. Club:
The First Lady acquits herself just fine, but I think it’s safe to say that, as far as executive branch guest stars go, she’s no Joe Biden. But then, who is!?
The Architect plays to get Pawnee free WiFi
From Alan Sepinwall's interview with showrunner Mike Schur at Hitfix:
Who created The Cones of Dunshire, and how thoroughly have the actual rules been mapped out? Could the writing staff play an actual game right now with the props that have been built, or is it like True American on “New Girl,” where you're not worried about the rules beyond an excuse for characters to say silly things?

Mike Schur: It's a true team effort, though Dave King (active gamer and Settlers of Catan enthusiast) has been a driving force. When we decided to bring it back as a key plot point, and have Ben and others actually play it, all I cared about is that I wanted like 50 new gameplay terms, because I want it to seem like the most complicated and impenetrable board game ever invented. The actual rules and terms are modified chunks of a bunch of different existing games. We worked directly with Mayfair Games, who actually designed the pieces for us, and there has been talk of releasing an actual version, though at this point based on what we've seen I have no idea how you'd create an actual functioning set of rules that includes all of the nonsense we've written.

There were a lot of stories this year about how terrible the people of Pawnee can be, and Leslie took a lot of abuse from the citizens, from Jamm, etc. Is that material largely out the window now that she's working on a national scale? Or will the stupidity and fatness of the town still be an integral part of the show?

Mike Schur: I'm not sure, but I think we're more inclined to have Pawnee recede into the background a little. Leslie has always wanted to fix the town and make it perfect, and part of her maturation was learning that it's impossible -- there is no perfect utopian town, 100% full of learned, thoughtful citizens who actively contemplate the interests of society. She came to terms with that slowly over six seasons, left the town better than she'd found it (as per classic camping ground rules), and made the decision to focus her energies on bigger projects. The decision to leave her physically in Pawnee, though, means that she can still dip her toes into that water, if we are so inclined.

  • Where do we go from here?: It will be interesting to see whether this time jump infuses the show with a different direction or if it's just the same stories, same quirks and character in a different 2017 office. Although, Leslie is now playing on a federal stage. So that does open up some story possibilities. And whether next season will be the show's last is still an open question. However, Schur has already floated an idea for how the series might end.
"You ready?" —Ben Wyatt

"Not at all. But that's never stopped us before." —Leslie Knope

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Dr RJ ... I love (13+ / 0-)

    the show and I love your review/overview. Many thanks for taking the time to explore popular culture with us. It's fun for me and I hope for many more here at the GOS.

    The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    by maggiejean on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 07:40:31 PM PDT

  •  correction (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Doctor RJ, side pocket

    I think you mean Larry.

    The first man who, having enclosed a piece of land, took it into his head to say, "This is mine," and found people simple enough to believe him, was the true founder of civil society. - Rousseau, Discourse on Inequality Among Men

    by James Allen on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 07:46:15 PM PDT

    •  Actually (5+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      James Allen, dougymi, side pocket, Trix, mwh191

      It's now (or at least in 2017, it will be) Terry.

      From Hitfix:

      Do you feel there's any difference between "Jerry" (an honest mistake made years ago that Garry was too sheepish to correct) and "Larry" (the group actively ignoring what they know — or think — is his real name)? Is there a point you cannot push his suffering past?

      Mike Schur: I have gathered that you, personally, are maybe not such a huge fan of his name changes. Which I understand, how someone might feel that is too cruel. (On the other hand, he did print expensive menus for Tom's Bistro with pictures of his dog's butt instead of the dishes being offered, so maybe it's karma.) I will only add that Garry/Larry/Jerry/Terry still has the best life of anyone on the show, in many ways, and I would bet that when the show sails off into the sunset, his ending will be a happy one.

  •  Is this a case of Shark Jumping? nt (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Doctor RJ, annieli, side pocket, Trix, shaso

    I want 1 less Tiny Coffin, Why Don't You? Support The President's Gun Violence Plan.

    by JML9999 on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 07:56:31 PM PDT

    •  Nuke The Fridge (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JML9999, side pocket, LihTox

      Only time will tell. If the show had ended without the time jump, I think it would have probably been a satisfying conclusion to the story.

      A lot of the shows fans did not like the pregnancy storyline and thought it was a bad sign. Not because Leslie should never have children. It's just that whenever a show introduces a new baby/child (e.g. cousin Oliver on The Brady Bunch or Olivia on The Cosby Show) it almost never goes well in the long-run.

      However, since the show is skipping over some of the baby years, maybe they won't fall into those pitfalls. Also, the time-jump in and of itself is not a "shark jumping" event. A lot of shows have pulled it off and made it an interesting story development.

  •  TV a Wasteland still "....talking of Michelangelo" (0+ / 0-)
    The series has been called the "most progressive show" on television,

    Warning - some snark may be above‽ (-9.50; -7.03)‽ eState4Column5©2013 "I’m not the strapping young Muslim socialist that I used to be" - Barack Obama 04/27/2013 (@eState4Column5).

    by annieli on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 08:10:33 PM PDT

  •  we tried it the first season (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Doctor RJ

    we didn't get it.  same for 30 Rock.  it left us puzzled when it started getting awards.  there must be something there for others but i guess it isn't our style of humor.

    I'm a blue drop in a red bucket.

    by blue drop on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 09:14:25 PM PDT

    •  It's Much Different From The Second Season Onward (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Most people feel the first season is bad. But it does set up a few things for the show. The second season is where they found the dynamics of the characters, and got the general tone of the series down.

  •  Doctor RJ (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Doctor RJ

    I have no clue whatsoever about this show.
    I just came by to lend support.
    It sure looks like you know your way around reviews & synopsis es. (plural?)

    I`m already against the next war.

    by Knucklehead on Fri Apr 25, 2014 at 10:07:22 PM PDT

  •  Great show. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Doctor RJ, shaso

    And April is the best.

  •  that critique of the pregnancy (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Doctor RJ, LihTox, CoyoteMarti

    was way off-base.

    1. It wasn't planned, it was an accidental pregnancy.
    2. It wasn't "retconned" that all of what she did was just "preparation for having babies," that is not what that line meant.  It means that all of those struggles PREPARED them for that moment.  Totally a Knope way of looking at things, and completely consistent with her character.  It did not in any way reduce her to "whatever was tied up in her placenta package."

    That whole critique really strained to try to capture (an admittedly silly) pregnancy that was over-the-top in P&R fashion (and as the article admits, it would be weirder if the character DIDNT have a baby).

    I'd also point out that as the episode ends, three years have passed, and she's dominating (in a positive manner) a large organization, with her husband as willing but subordinate helper.

    And that's anti-feminist??

    •  Timing (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Doctor RJ

      I think Libby Hill's article in AVClub criticizing the pregnancy was written before the final episode aired: it's dated "April 24th" and it opens by discussing the "penultimate episode".  Hopefully she'll write a followup.

    •  pregnancy (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Doctor RJ

      It isn't plausible that the pregnancy was accidental.  For someone as organized/control-freak as Leslie, she'd either be trying or on birth control.

      I really worry about next season.  Either the show becomes consumed by the kids, or it ignores them entirely.  Neither works, and a middle ground doesn't work either.  Either can work, The League is a great example of ignoring the kids, but adding it on in the middle of a show just too drastically alters the dynamics of the show.

      •  eh (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Doctor RJ

        you can get pregnant on birth control, believe me, I've experienced that situation, well my girlfriend at the time did.  It was not something either of us were very happy about.

        I'm not sure I see any issue with what you are talking about.  I doubt they ignore the kids.  I strongly suspect they will show Leslie as a strong working woman and a great mom.  What's more progressive/feminist than that?

        Kids always bring in chances for silliness.  Ron's interactions with his stepkids haven't done anything to make his character any less off.  I don't see why it would do that to Leslie or Ben's characters.

        The only characters who I think would be significantly in danger of being negatively affected by kids are April and Andy because they've made Andy such a buffoon (which I wish they'd not gone quite so far in making him an idiot).

        Still, they might be setting that up too with his kids singing career.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site