Skip to main content

A recently released extended excerpt of Sterling's conversation with his "girlfriend" V. Stiviano may say more about the Clippers owners mindset than anything else.

Following an exchange where he asks Stiviano whether she thinks he's a racist she poses the question “Do you know that you have a whole team that’s black, that plays for you?" He responds with the following,

“I support them and give them food, and clothes, and cars, and houses. Who gives that to them? Does someone else give that to them?”
You would expect him to say "they are well paid" or some other words characterizing an employer/employee relationship. But Sterling instead uses the paternal language often used by people who defended the institution of slavery. The very language heard by Cliven Bundy.

It would seem that Donald Sterling looks upon his players as his wards or his children. They are treated well, they are well fed, clothed and housed. So how dare anyone suggest he is a racist.

During the exchange Sterling also takes full credit for the team's existence, as if the players are a mere afterthought. This is the same attitude of all the self-proclaimed job creators who cannot accept the obvious truth that without people doing the jobs there would be no business.

But it is the way in which he denies his racism that is most telling. He expresses a strain of paternalism that, while certainly common in the bygone era of the pre-Civil War South, has no place in the United States today.

Originally posted to September 17, 1787 on Sun Apr 27, 2014 at 11:16 AM PDT.

Also republished by Black Kos community, Barriers and Bridges, and White Privilege Working Group.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site