Skip to main content

When President Obama was re-elected in 2012, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' (AAOS) President, John R. Tongue, M.D., released a statement congratulating the President and praising his "success in improving access to health insurance coverage and preventive care, lowering prescription drug costs and implementing consumer safeguards against insurance industry abuse during his first term".

 This is not to say that the Academy has no issues with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). AAOS, while lauding the ACA's improvements in access to care and in reigning in insurance industry abuses, has expressed concerns regarding cost-containment provisions such as the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). This is to be expected with a health reform plan that preserves the system of private insurance as ACA does. All affected industry parties -- practitioners, hospitals, medical device manufacturers, and insurance companies -- are contending to minimize impacts of the ACA to their own bottom line. But generally, the AAOS response to the ACA has been constructive.

One Tucson, Arizona orthopedic surgeon has responded to the arrival of 'Obamacare" in a decidedly less constructive manner. According to a report by Tucson TV station KVOA, Dr. David Martin is refusing to treat 'Obamacare' patients.

A Tucson woman, Julie Miller,  in need of knee arthroplasty contacted Dr. Martin's office to set up an appointment and was told that the doctor does not see patients insured through 'Obamacare'. Miller purchased a Blue Cross insurance policy through the healthcare marketplace. Dr. Martin participates in the Blue Cross network attached to Miller's plan and would be reimbursed according to the same fee schedule as any other Blue Cross patient. So there was no evident financial downside for Dr. Martin.

KVOA attempted to contact Dr. Martin for comment but he declined. An appointment scheduler in his office confirmed his refusal to treat 'Obamacare' patients.

Dr. Martin's refusal to provide care to Julie Miller and other patients like her who gained health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, despite his willingness to accept payment from Blue Cross for other patients, appears to be a petulant political protest -- a temper tantrum -- and he deserves to be publicly shamed for it. 

But perhaps Ms. Miller is better off. She will undoubtedly find a reputable surgeon more than willing to provide her with the needed care. And would you want to be treated by a physician with an attitude like Dr. Martin's? I know that I wouldn't.

 

Originally posted to BlueDuPage on Sun Apr 27, 2014 at 02:27 PM PDT.

Also republished by Obamacare Saves Lives.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  this was diaried yesterday (7+ / 0-)

    I think but it's worth another look. I've become more and more aware of physicians and specialists who say they accept both Medicare and Medicaid patients but somehow they'll never quite give you It will invariably be canceled by them or postponed indefinitely or they'll never return your calls for scheduling. This is happening to me and has been going on for a long time I don't know what to do about it or to whom I should complain but I have a pretty serious situation going on.
    I think it's a despicable form of political revenge and they all need to be called out for it. Let's make a list for the Tucson area. I'd love to add two names to it but am afraid to do anything because my situation is dangerous and unresolved. I'm at their mercy.
    I hope your diary stays up and more people will comment.

    •  It is clear that a patient suffering (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      LiberalLoner, sfgb, white blitz, myboo

      this treatment should complain to the insurer, to any relevant medical associations and certification boards, to state regulators, and to health care rights groups.

      What I would like to know, first of all, is whether the network agreement with the insurer has the force of contract, so that the doctor has to accept patients with that insurance, and if not, why not?

      Back off, man. I'm a logician.—GOPBustersā„¢

      by Mokurai on Sun Apr 27, 2014 at 05:29:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site