Skip to main content

The botched Oklahoma execution of Clayton Lockett has called our continued use of the death penalty in this country back into question. In many ways, the death penalty is an abhorrent attempt to sate an irrational cultural bloodlust, rooted in vengeance and barbarism and detached from data.
That is the opening of Eye-for-an-Eye Incivility
, the first of Blow's New York Times columns to appear in his new slot on Monday mornings (where he joins Paul Krugman on the op ed page).  It is of course occasioned by the botched execution in Oklahoma, to which he refers, but it is in fact focused on the issue of the death penalty in general.

Let me make clear before I continue:  it took me a while, but I finally reached the conclusion that I could no longer support the death penalty.  I explained my reasoning here in piece titled ... no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death, borrowing my title from a dissenting opinion by Justice William Brennan.  I will not recapitulate my thinking, which is thoroughly expressed in that piece.

I realize that some will continue to justify at least some executions.  For them perhaps nothing anyone can offer will change their minds, which saddens me.  Some are already convinced, and the only purpose Blow's article may therefore serve is to provide some ammunition when they engage in discussions with those whose minds are not yet made up.  

Blow offers a number of facts, well-sourced, to consider.

Let me cite just a few before delving a bit more deeply into the power of his opinions.

Our continued use of the death penalty does not put us in good company. According to a 2014 report from Amnesty International, “only nine countries have continuously executed in each of the past five years — Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, U.S.A. and Yemen.”
And then there is this chart from Time Magazine which graphs every single US execution since 1700, from which we learn that
America has executed 15,717 people since 1700, most of them hanged. The peak year for executions was 1935 with nearly 200 people put to death, mostly by electrocution. In 2014, 20 people have been put to death, all by lethal injection.
Please keep reading.

I am less concerned with the cost of capital sentences. Blow quotes research by Professer Jeffrey Fagin that the average capital sentence costs in the range of $2.5 million to $5 million as compared to less than $1 million for a sentence of life without parole.  I worry that when we reduce what should be moral arguments to financial ones, we devalue the lives of those who are less well off -  that is in fact the reasoning for determining the awards in wrongful death suits.  I would suffer a far greater penalty for causing the wrongful death of a Bill Gates than of a homeless, mentally ill street person.  

After recounting some of the problems with the botched Oklahoma execution, Blow asks

How does a death like this pass constitutional muster, with our guarantee against “cruel and unusual punishment,” even for a person convicted of administering cruel and unusual punishment?
He follows by quoting the words of the President describing some of the problems with our application of the death penalty.  Perhaps it is irrelevant, and would not fit the thrust of this column, but I wonder if Blow might not consider taking those words of the President and ask why he does not apply similar reasoning to the summary executions / assassinations by drone?  Why does not he at least challenge the President, who still accepts application of the death penalty in some circumstances?

Allow me to offer just a few more snips.

In introducing the aforementioned chart from Time Blow writes

Unfortunately, the death penalty is part of this country’s blood memory, a memory we are having a hard time shaking.
this country's blood memory -  perhaps it should be blood lust?  After all, the list of legal executions does not include hundred of lynchings, primarily of minorities of one sort or another.  It is almost certainly a blood lust that connects with our crazed gun culture, including the increasing rationalization of the the unrestricted use of violent force - almost always by firearm - in situations that to most rationale minds is not necessary, and again, is almost an occasion of a white male applying the deadly force of the firearm against someone who can be considered "other" - of color, of foreign origin. . . .

As I often in my posts here rely upon the words of others to make a point, so does Blow.  He warns that even our attempts to address problems with the application of the death penalty raises questions, and then again quotes Professor Fagan, who in part says

"... we wonder whether such necessary and admirable efforts to avoid error and the horror of the execution of the innocent won’t — after many hundreds of millions of dollars of trying — burden the country with a death penalty that will be ineffective, unreasonably expensive and politically corrosive to the broader search for justice.”
Of course, that presumes that we have an interest in the broader search for justice.  One might well offer many exemplars that would indicate otherwise:

That is of course far too much to cover effectively in one op ed.

Which after all is about the death penalty.

So allow me to return to Blow.

I think this is a powerful column.

Had I any doubt, I would merely return to his final words, which appear immediately after the quote from Fagan you have just read:

We are standing on the graves of the executed, and it is not a morally elevated position.
Perhaps words attributed to Gandhi (although no exact source has ever been found) are here applicable:

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind

I believe in our continued use of capital punishment we are at the least demonstrating a horrible moral blindness, and at worst creating a situation which allows others to rationalize the increasing escalation of violence, whether under color of law or other justification.

Our continued reliance upon the death penalty is an example of the worst of American Exceptionalism, and is for me something that makes me ashamed of my country.

What about you?

-  the sloppy prosecution that allowed George Zimmerman to walk
-  the refusal to bring prosecutions against Wall Street firms and individuals that almost brought down the world's economic system
- the refusal to prosecute people in the CIA for gross violations of US and international law
- the continued practice of the national administration in using the state secrets doctrine to prevent cases that could stop various abuses of the intelligence apparatus
- the prosecution of whistleblowers

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (16+ / 0-)

    "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive and go do it, because what the world needs is more people who have come alive." - Howard Thurman

    by teacherken on Mon May 05, 2014 at 03:45:48 AM PDT

  •  apologies for the html errors (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    P Carey, The Marti, CenPhx

    but neither my school computer nor my cell phone will let me edit the diary.  Sorry

    "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive and go do it, because what the world needs is more people who have come alive." - Howard Thurman

    by teacherken on Mon May 05, 2014 at 04:16:38 AM PDT

    •  okay, was able to borrow an Ipad (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      P Carey, The Marti, CenPhx

      and fix the html error

      I hope at least a few people find this of use

      we are now into the first ofr 4 consecutive weeks of testing, so pardon me if I am more than a little distracted (as well as being frustrated)

      "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive and go do it, because what the world needs is more people who have come alive." - Howard Thurman

      by teacherken on Mon May 05, 2014 at 04:34:17 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Opposed to death penalty (8+ / 0-)

    Always have been.  It has no place in civilized society.

    Reach out your hand if your cup be empty, If your cup is full may it be again

    by VPofKarma on Mon May 05, 2014 at 04:49:25 AM PDT

  •  I would have hoped not to be discussing the (5+ / 0-)

    death penalty in America in 2014, but my outlook was a bit rosy I suppose.

    Thanks for this teacherken; we need to continue discussing these issues in the open and hope that we can change the world one person at a time.

    Good luck with the testing.

  •  I agree that stand-your-ground and careless use (5+ / 0-)

    of the death penalty promote acceptance of drone-bomb murders.  This is the same mentality that has refused to close Guantanamo, or even release prisoners who are known to be innocent.  

    Some days I wonder if we even have a moral compass left.  

  •  Thanks nt (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    teacherken, The Marti, CenPhx

    nosotros no somos estúpidos

    by a2nite on Mon May 05, 2014 at 05:01:44 AM PDT

  •  Ordering the killing of some people in cold (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    The Marti, CenPhx, johanus

    blood is the realization of the culture of obedience. That the act being carried out is irrational is indicative. The culture of obedience, since it relies on the use of force, is perforce unreasonable.
    In a sense, the culture of obedience is a sort of secular religion, supposedly subservient to the rule of law, and some sacrifices must be made. Those put to death are the sacrificial lambs. They die prematurely so the rest of us don't have to.

    Re-read Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery."

    The community is made out to be perverse. But that's only because there is a perversion, the assertion that humans are beastly, in some people's minds. The Constitution assumes that humans are good and evil is an aberration. That's an assumption the Cons cannot abide because without the assumption that humans are basically bad, there is no excuse for making them behave as one wants. If humans are good, then they are entitled to be free. It is only if they are bad, that they are subject to being ruled.

    For people who think like that, the rule of law is a lovely invention. The law is both impersonal and long-lasting. The law makers can do their thing and then sit back and watch as the law does their bidding and killing. That's how it was in Pontius Pilate's day and, contrary to what Jesus intended, his death did not put an end to it.
    Why?
    Some humans derive a lot of satisfaction out of bringing death indirectly, of killing without fear of retribution. Judges and juries get off on telling some poor schmuck "I'm going to have you killed and you can't do anything about it."

    I'd be disqualified from sitting on such a jury. They only select people who pronounce themselves ready and willing to kill by remote control. So, presumably, unless a defendant has a death wish (some do), a person who is sentenced to death has not been tried by a jury of his peers. Even if he's a cold-blooded killer, a jury of cold-blooded killers is not an admirable peer group.

    http://hannah.smith-family.com

    by hannah on Mon May 05, 2014 at 05:05:51 AM PDT

  •  We have lots of data. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, Bethesda 1971, teacherken, Apost8

    -- Since 1976, 1,264 people have been executed in America.

    -- We have detailed descriptions for over 900 of these killings.

    -- Of the 900+ just over 3% were "botched" with the victims suffering during the killing.

    Roughly 1 in 30 executions will result in torture. It's human error. And the executioners have not gotten better at avoiding torture. Not at all.

    Of course the GOPer sociopaths/psychopaths love it. Plays to their REVENGE!! offering.

    Perfect for the "Ayn Rand Jesus" shtick.

    "Stealing kids' lunch money makes them strong and independent." -- Paul "False Prophet" Ryan von Koch

    by waterstreet2013 on Mon May 05, 2014 at 06:30:12 AM PDT

  •  Fallin is a moral leper (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    teacherken
  •  Opposed since I was about 11 years old. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VPofKarma, sturunner, teacherken

    One summer when I was about 11 years old, many years ago, we were camping somewhere along the Northern CA coast, our typical summer vacation. We invited the older couple camped next to us to sit around the campfire with us one evening. It turned out that the man was the chaplain for Death Row in San Quentin. He spoke passionately and movingly about his opposition to the death penalty. He was far from naive about the actions of the prisoners; he knew them well. He knew  a few were in fact innocent, many not, and some remained potential killers. But he knew that we should not become murderers ourselves.

    His words - his ministry, if you will - spoke straight to my soul. My opposition to the death penalty dates from that conversation under the redwood trees, in the firelight. My opposition has never wavered, only deepened. Thanks, TK, for summarizing Charles Blow's essay; as Quakers say, "That Friend speaks my mind."

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site