Skip to main content

Politics can be viewed as a war of words: claims, counter-claims, verbal attacks, lies, half-truths, talking points, shouting, and innuendo. Sometimes political campaigns engage in gossip in order to create havoc in the opposition. Sometimes this works, and sometimes it has unforeseen consequences.


Today we usually think about gossip as a form of idle talk (true or imagined) about friends or acquaintances. This is not, of course, what gossip originally meant. Gossip comes to us from the Old English “godsibb” which came from “god” meaning “God” and “sibb” meaning “relative.” In Old English, “godsibb” meant “sponsor or godparent.” In other words, godsibbs were the sponsors of children at Christian baptisms.

As Old English evolved into Middle English, the meaning of “godsibb” was extended to “any familiar acquaintance,” particularly women friends who had been invited to attend a birth. By the 1560s, it had become “gossip” and referred to “anyone engaging in familiar or idle talk.” About 1811, its meaning was extended to “trifling talk, groundless rumor.”

The noun “gossip” was also used as a verb meaning “to talk idly about the affairs of others” by about 1620.


In the world of American politics, gossip is often used as a tool for raising havoc with the opposition’s campaign. “Havoc” came into English from Norman French where it functioned as a war cry: a signal meaning that the warriors could attack and plunder indiscriminately. The cry “havoc” meant that there was to be no mercy.

The etymology of “havoc” shows that it comes from the Old French “havot” meaning “pillaging, looting” and is related to the verb “haver” meaning “to seize, grasp.” This may have come from the Latin verb “habere” meaning “to have, possess.”

Hoist by one’s own petard:

Sometimes political plans to raise havoc with the opposition’s campaign don’t work and may, in fact, backfire creating problems for those who initially planned the havoc. When someone has become a victim of their own plans to do harm to others, it is sometimes said that they “have been hoisted by their own petard.” I suspect that most modern English speakers, while understanding the sentiment in this phrase, don’t know what a petard is.

During Europe’s medieval period that was a lot of warfare that involved attacking castles. Since castles tended to be well fortified with high, sturdy walls and solid gates, gaining entrance could be a problem for the attackers. One popular way to breach the castle’s gates was to use a petard: this was a kind of explosive device. This meant placing the device, made from gunpowder, near the gate and lighting the fuse. Fuses, like the explosive device itself, could be a bit finicky and thus it was not uncommon for the petard to explode prematurely. When the explosion came too soon, the man laying it might be blown into the air—hoisted by his own petard.

With regard to etymology, “petard” came into English about 1590 from the French “petard,” which came from the Middle French “péter” meaning “break wind,” which, in turn, came from the Old French “pet,” meaning “a fart.” Going back farther in time, this came from the Proto-Indo-European “*pezd-” meaning “to fart.”

The phrase “hoist with one’s petard” became popular in English through the play Hamlet written by William Shakespeare.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site