Skip to main content

Screencap of NRCC fundraising page
So much for simply "getting to the bottom of this."
Republicans were licking their chops about the "new revelation" that was going to give them another reason to attack Democrats on #Benghazi. But just when they thought they might finally have their best opportunity yet to make their tastiest political hay, they go screw it up again.

By way of background, Republicans have reached a fever pitch about the embassy attack in Benghazi in the past couple of weeks owing to a recently released email by White House Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes. This email contained talking points on several issues, including Benghazi, for then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to use for her appearances on the Sunday show circuit in the aftermath of the attack. The email contains nothing revelatory and contributes nothing new to the conversation beyond what we already know, and what has already been reported in major media outlets: that the White House crafted talking points based off the inaccurate information that the CIA provided regarding the motivation for the attack.

The White House has already acknowledged this, and has already accepted responsibility for the security failure. But that is not stopping House Republicans from claiming with no documentation that there was a cover-up, because, reasons.

More below the fold.

Previous Benghazi probes have found absolutely nothing, but have cost millions of dollars and thousands of personnel hours. And even though this latest investigation will have exactly the same result as the previous ones, the House voted along essentially partisan lines to create yet another committee—and the panel is so popular among Republicans that 206 members of their caucus have applied for the six positions available.

But if there were ever any question that Republican motivations for this new effort have nothing to do with Ambassador Stevens and three others who lost their lives there, and are all about seeking political advantage and firing up the donor base, Republican activities since then have more than amply proved the case. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), chair of this newly created committee, presumably wants the job he does to be taken seriously, but one has to wonder if he even knows what that job is. In response to a question by MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, Gowdy seemed to imply that his perception of his job as committee chair is to put Democrats on trial:

...if an administration is slow-walking document production, I can’t end a trial simply because the defense won’t cooperate.”
But even Gowdy draws a line at using his committee as a fundraising tool. He may want to put Democrats on trial, but using it to raise money is a bridge too far, even for him. The National Republican Congressional Committee, however, has other ideas. Despite Gowdy's exhortations not to, the National Republican Congressional Committee sent a fundraising email to its list about the investigative panel before it had even been formally created, and the NRCC's subsequent activities have been equally devoid of tact.

The NRCC has established a new microsite, benghaziwatchdogs.com. Clicking on the main graphic on the site takes viewers to a page claiming that "no one will get away from Gowdy and the Select Committee" and encouraging donations to "fight liberals." The page is even adorned with a GIF graphic claiming that "without you, they will control America." Well, so much for honoring the four dead Americans by "finding out what really happened," right?

It turns out, of course, that playing such crass politics has negative consequences. The NRCC has been reamed for its activities in a wide array of media outlets, and Speaker Boehner is refusing to answer repeated inquiries about the blatant efforts of his caucus to profit off the creation of the committee.

Not that any of that matters to Republican leadership. Now that their opposition to Obamacare has become an embarrassment for them, they are looking for a new issue to hang their hat on while rallying their base and avoiding a leadership coup. After all, it's like Pete Sessions says: If there's a witch-hunt on, that must mean there's a witch out there. Somewhere.

Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site