Skip to main content

In two recently-filed and largely overlooked legal briefs, the Department of Justice defended the constitutionality of the FISA Amendment Act, which codified President Bush's warrantless wiretapping program.

As Jameel Jaffer notes in The Guardian, this isn't particularly surprising, given the Obama administration's aggressive defense of bulk surveillance and the collection of metadata.

However, this is what's surprising: the Obama administration is now arguing that the Constitution – and citizens' privacy rights contained therein – are not in play when it comes to U.S. citizens' communications with people or interests abroad.

"The privacy rights of US persons in international communications are significantly diminished, if not completely eliminated, when those communications have been transmitted to or obtained from non-US persons located outside the United States."
This view – that Americans do not have any privacy rights when contacting someone outside the U.S. – is a radical one. For it attempts to upend the long-held view, established in Katz v. United States, that Americans have a reasonable "expectation of privacy" during a phone call or private communication, and that such communication is constitutionally-protected by the Fourth Amendment.

Essentially, the DOJ is arguing that if I email my colleague in Sydney, or call my financial advisor in Toronto, my privacy rights are "eliminated" by my communication crossing the U.S. border. Meaning: the NSA can record my phone calls and collect data contained in my emails without a warrant.

Why? Because, according to the DOJ, I have no rights as a U.S. citizen which protect my privacy in such circumstances.

Here's Jaffer:

The government's argument is not simply that the NSA has broad authority to monitor Americans' international communications. The US government is arguing that the NSA's authority is unlimited in this respect. If the government is right, nothing in the Constitution bars the NSA from monitoring a phone call between a journalist in New York City and his source in London. For that matter, nothing bars the NSA from monitoring every call and email between Americans in the United States and their non-American friends, relatives, and colleagues overseas.

In the government's view, there is no need to ask whether the 2008 [Bush-era] law violates Americans' privacy rights, because in this context Americans have no rights to be violated.

This is a really big deal. According to the DOJ, no American has privacy rights when contacting someone abroad, which makes any such communication open to infinite surveillance without a warrant.

It doesn't matter who you are, or who you're communicating with. You have no privacy rights, according to the Obama administration. For the sake of 'national security,' they must be "completely eliminated."

--§--

What Do You Buy For the Children
David Harris-Gershon is author of the memoir What Do You Buy the Children of the Terrorist Who Tried to Kill Your Wife?, just out from Oneworld Publications.


Originally posted to David Harris-Gershon (The Troubadour) on Wed May 14, 2014 at 12:22 PM PDT.

Also republished by Writing by David Harris Gershon.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site