Skip to main content

I don't want to give them the kiss of death or be in any way offensive to my allies of various creeds and backgrounds, but I, as a Christian, learn so much about "Christianity," as it should be expressed, from non-Christians and especially those who do not do things "in the name of Christ." If anyone says they are doing something in the real world, as opposed to at the church altar, "in the name of Christ," I am pretty skeptical, to say the least. Although I am Christian and socialist, I do not self-identify as "Christian socialist" (I self-identify as "democratic socialist") because I want to be in solidarity with all true socialists, not just the ones who call themselves "Christian." At this point in my life, my greatest spiritual influences other than the Psalms and the beautiful world itself are every low wage or unemployed worker, addict, and prisoner I meet and every true socialist I interact with, including those who are dead but left behind sayings or writings.

The to me "inspired" words of not only Jesus Christ (the greatest democrat) but also Rosa Luxemburg, Antonio Gramsci, and "George Orwell" are eternal fonts of revolutionary brilliance, even when I do not agree with every word. I wash myself in their creative baptism, and I am made clean and more capable of being creatively compassionate myself. The grotesque cruel failures of Stalin and Mao are with me too as the most humiliating of reminders of the unending need for true and deep democracy and never giving in to dictatorship under "socialism" deserving of the name. Jesus (and Rosa and Antonio) would never has acquiesced in the doings of Stalin and Mao, and I have the contemporaneous words of George (Eric Arthur Blair) to prove that to my satisfaction.

These days I am also inspired by the hard work and innovative thinking of my friends whom I follow at Daily Kos, whether they think of themselves as socialists or not. Through the Socratic process, true socialism is advanced in truth. We are not opposing forces, for as Rosa said, while "social democracy" is "only the advance guard of the proletariat" it is nonetheless to be respected as "the embodiment of the modern proletariat's class struggle." I believe that we are chipping away in search of a global socialism which provides a just and loving world for all of humanity: "For us there is no minimal and no maximal program; socialism is one and the same thing: this is the minimum we have to realize today." ("Our Program and the Political Situation," in the Rosa Luxemburg Internet Archive.)

lehman scott's excellent recent diary, On the Need for a New Economic Paradigm, inspired me to write these words (when I republished my own recent Pope Francis-related diary):

So much depends on true democracy being allowed to broaden, deepen, and flourish in the economic sphere. That is one of the things that concerns me about Pope Francis, whom I admire in many ways. He shows great concern for the poor but does not link this with how laws currently pass or don’t pass, the role of the unelected judiciary that keeps constitutional interpretation in the U.S. locked in the past and doing the bidding of capital, and the lack of a democratic global institution accessible directly by the people in search of rights. I published this post earlier this week at my Galtisalie blog at Daily Kos because of these concerns, as well as emerging events in Spain threatening women’s right to control their own bodies. I hope that it is taken for the constructive criticism in the spirit of George Orwell in which it is intended. It was written not to insult Pope Francis but to hold him to the highest standard, which he should demand from himself on behalf of the one he follows. This standard is more exacting than promotion of the interests of any institution, including the so-called “Church.” If the Church is “the body of Christ” comprised of “Christians,” that body should be willing to sacrifice itself to create “earth as it is in heaven” and trust that it will be resurrected to the greater glory.


Brother Francisco

I love democracy, which gives freedom even to our oppressors and their mercenaries:
Freedom only for the supporters of the government, only for the members of a party – however numerous they may be – is no freedom at all. Freedom is always the freedom of the dissenter. Not because of the fanaticism of "justice", but rather because all that is instructive, wholesome, and purifying in political freedom depends on this essential characteristic, and its effects cease to work when "freedom" becomes a privilege.
(Rosa Luxemburg, The Russian Revolution, Chapter 6, The Problem of Dictatorship.)
But true democracy does not allow our oppressors and their mercenaries to have more speech than every other person because of their money and repression of our speech. The end result of this bought and paid for "democracy" is not democracy worthy of the name any more than "real" socialism under Stalin and Mao was "socialism" worthy of the name. Those who oppose democracy, including the five conservative Catholic male "Justices" on SCOTUS are in need of repentance, and, if they would follow the example of Jesus, would not give in to the powerful and their corporations but instead start serving the interests of the people. Repent for deep democracy is at hand. We are going to build deep democracy in the U.S. and the world whether you help us or not.


Galtisalie, a peaceful democratically-revolutionary socialist living in the Deep South of the U.S., forced to express himself pseudonymously because of repression.

Originally posted to Galtisalie on Sat May 17, 2014 at 05:11 AM PDT.

Also republished by Hellraisers Journal and Street Prophets .

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    garden variety democratic socialist: accepting life's complexity|striving for global stewardship of our soil and other resources to meet everyone's basic needs|being a friend to the weak

    by Galtisalie on Sat May 17, 2014 at 05:11:04 AM PDT

  •  Sinc religion sticks its nose in the (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Galtisalie, shaharazade, Smoh, pvasileff, corvo

    …public square and US politics, then these organizations MUST start paying for the privilege.

    It costs money to gather bucks in the US commonwealth. I'm sick to death of corporate tax cheats sucking off the infrastructure. I don't care what they are selling.

    Pay up, deadbeats.

    •  I'm undecided on tax treatment of institutional (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JayRaye, Pluto

      churches and other religious organizations, but you make an excellent point. Some clearly in an official capacity become endorsement machines, but, in the case of the civil rights era, clergy helped to speak the truth to power. I attend and appreciate an institutional church whose clergy generally does not get politically-involved. I'm not sure that is good. I'm over on the liberation theology side of things. I think we should all be about doing good as fearlessly as possible, and that includes what we say or "preach." I wish religions were non-hierarchical and not beholden to rich parishioners who can make big tax deductible donations. To me the crying shame is that followers of a religion tend to become preoccupied with the business and lose their questioning freedom both within and without the religion. Therefore, I'm advocating that all Christians, including Pope Francis, speak out about undemocratic decisions that stand in the way of laws being "just" and "justice" being in the service of love. True religion of the heart and mind would survive any loss of tax exempt status. As a grown-up PK, I'm saddened by the state of institutional churches in general, but I know many clergy desperately want to do the right thing. I will, knowing nothing else I can do productive for them, pray for them--and work for a better world by fighting like hell for the living.

      garden variety democratic socialist: accepting life's complexity|striving for global stewardship of our soil and other resources to meet everyone's basic needs|being a friend to the weak

      by Galtisalie on Sat May 17, 2014 at 08:47:51 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I am saying this: (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        If they are non-profits, let them apply for non-profit status like other non-profit organizations must.

        If they are churning big dough, let them pay taxes like everyone else.

        True religion of the heart and mind would survive any loss of tax exempt status.
        I agree.
        Therefore, I'm advocating that all Christians, including Pope Francis, speak out about undemocratic decisions that stand in the way of laws being "just" and "justice" being in the service of love.
        Anyone can and should do that -- with or without a religion.

        If you churn a profit from your religion or your software company or your oil fracking company -- pay your taxes on that profit.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site