Skip to main content

Scott Honour is a candidate in the Minnesota GOP gubernatorial primary. Candidates for governor and lt. governor run on the same line, like president and VP, and the gubernatorial candidates get to choose their running mates. Honour chose a freshman state senator who supported the defeated constitutional amendment to require photo ID for voting in 2012. This was cross-posted on MN Progressive Project.

If a Democrat did this, Republicans would be all over it screaming "voter fraud". On her campaign's Facebook page, State Sen. Karin Housley, just chosen as Scott Honour's running mate, posted a photo of a ballot with her name marked:

Housley Facebook post of ballot photo

In the comments, she was informed it's illegal to take photos of ballots. Her response to that comment and another calling it a "curious law" was, "I was thinking the same thing. My ballot. My vote. My freedom of speech. I think it was written before pint size camera phones. You can take a picture of you voting though, if you get the okay from the election judge."

Housley comment on ballot photo

I don't know the law about someone taking a photo of you voting if you get permission. I do know the reason it's illegal to photograph your ballot is for the same reason it's illegal to sign your ballot or leave identifying marks. It's so that a corrupt election official can't check that you voted as expected if you were bribed or threatened to vote a certain way. Yes, officials used to do this. Jimmy Carter talked about seeing county officials in rural Georgia who would check welfare recipients' ballots before allowing them in the ballot box to check they voted as told, as a condition of keeping their benefits. That sort of thing is why we have secret ballots, and the secrecy works only if your ballot can't be identified. If your ballot can be identified, like a photo you took of your ballot being sent to whoever is checking on you, they now have a means to enforce their instructions on your vote.

If someone wants to argue that this law violates free speech, go ahead, but for the moment, it's illegal. The people who sent photos of their ballot broke the law, even though I'll accept that they were just showing their enthusiasm. I certainly don't think Housely intended to commit or encourage fraud. I do think she should have asked for the why of the law before suggesting it's just a dumb law. The key thing though: I do think Republicans would be making a huge campaign issue out of this if a Democrat did it, claiming it proves their claims Democrats win by fraud are now proven.

Note that this fits the habit Republicans have when it comes to election law. When they encounter something with elections they don't immediately understand, they  don't bother asking for the reasoning before making groundless claims. There are dead people voting!!! They died after casting their own ballot and before the registration rolls were audited. They're registered in multiple precincts!!! They were registered voters who moved and re-registered at their new address, like the law requires, so they're on the registration rolls in multiple precincts until the rolls are caught up. Outgoing Secretary of State Mark Ritchie tried to change the law to have registrations follow voters as they move, but the Republicans in the legislature blocked it. Remember how angry Republicans became in 2008 --- still are actually --- that Norm Coleman's election night lead shrank a few hundred votes when the tallies were checked during the first canvass. There are always election night math errors made by exhausted election judges, so they go back and check their math, find the mistakes, and the totals change. The change in 2008 was remarkably tiny at a few hundred votes out of two million. Nonetheless, Republicans claim fraud. Still. I mean just last weekend, at the MNGOP convention, losing 2010 SOS candidate and freshly endorsed 2014 SOS candidate Dan Severson claimed Minnesota has corrupt elections, never mind that every bit of the recount was on camera watched by a whole bunch of people, and nothing untoward happened. We have maybe the cleanest elections in the country, but the tin foil hats are still firmly attached.

As for Housley herself, she supported photo ID in her 2012 campaign with specious arguments.

Housley comparing spray paint to voting

Since she didn't bother to ask and no one in her thread told her, you need proof of age for spray paint, not photo ID, so an underage person with a valid photo ID still can't buy it. It's restricted because kids sometimes use spray paint for graffiti and to get a high by sniffing the fumes. It's not like spray paint was picked at random for an age check. Ballots, interestingly, aren't useful either for graffit or find getting high off the fumes. Well, maybe when the ink is really fresh.

So, based on nothing, Housley was willing to take the right to vote away from people who can't get a photo ID (cue Republicans asking why anyone can't get an ID while refusing to listen to the answers), creating all sorts of complications with running an election. Then what should happen since she seemed OK with breaking the law by taking photographs of ballots, despite being a candidate who ought to know better?

For non-Minnesota readers, Honour is one of four serious candidates in the Republican primary. At this point, no one has any idea who has a lead. The winner will challenge Democratic incumbent Mark Dayton, who vetoed the photo ID bill in 2011, causing the Republican legislature to bypass the veto by making it a constitutional amendment, which lost in 2012. So Minnesota doesn't have a photo ID requirement.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The MNGOP really is a clown car. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    slapshoe

    I'm not the biggest fan of Gov. Dayton, but I don't need to give a second thought about whether to vote for him in November.

    "Much of movement conservatism is a con and the base is the marks." -- Chris Hayes

    by raptavio on Tue Jun 03, 2014 at 07:59:17 AM PDT

  •  I live in Woodbury, MN and I don't care about this (0+ / 0-)

    Housley is not my rep, as I am in neighboring district.

    However, getting worked up because a first time candidate takes a picture of her ballot does seem to be a very minor issue.

    Focus on the real issues. The last repub governor was terrible and tried to crash the MN economy. Dayton has done a great job moving the state forward, we now have a surplus, money refunded to schools, unemployment down, marriage equality done, etc.

    •  It's supposed to be unimportant (0+ / 0-)

      That was the point. If a Democrat did this, Republicans would make it a huge issue. It shows rank hypocrisy on the right. It isn't anything more than an innocent mistake, but she's happy to support photo ID to create problems for other people.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site