Skip to main content

Question: What's the first clue that someone is about to write something profoundly and unforgivably offensive?  

Answer: They have to begin with a disclaimer saying that what they are about to say isn't what they are about to say and will be intentionally misconstrued by people who are rightfully offended by what they have to say.

Case in point. Over at, the pet project created by notoriously hate-filled Matt Barber of the Liberty Council, a disgusting article penned by John Biver does exactly that. Perhaps knowing instinctively how repulsive people will find someone unequivocally seeking to draw parallels between gay people and necrophiliacs, Biver limply attempts to deflect any well-deserved anger he knows is coming his way.

This article is being published in June, 2014, but there’s little doubt that for many months and years into the future visitors will be finding their way here by clicking on various links found in hysterical and dishonest posts which claim that “ and John Biver say that homosexual sex is the equivalent of sex with the dead.”
Emphasis mine.

With this bullshit out of the way, it's time for Biver to get right down to shamelessly equating gay sex with necrophilia. He begins by making it perfectly clear that it isn't he who makes the case, it is the American Psychiatric Association, or was. He giddily points to the fact that at one time the APA had categorized homosexuality as a sexual deviancy, so there you have it, done and done. Never mind that the APA removed homosexuality from their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1974 and reclassified it as merely a variant of normal sexuality. But, you see, they only did that to avoid hurting our gay feelings, so politically correct has this organization become.

For the record, the back end of a man is as appealing to many as a dead body, but putting that aside, I didn’t list same-sex-sex alongside necrophilia, the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders did. Both, along with quite a few other variations, are listed as paraphilias. It must be noted that the APA is a highly politicized organization that is constantly moving classifications around in order to avoid hurting anyone’s feelings. (And we all know that there is nothing more important in life than avoiding that.)
Oh no, we wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings by saying that gay love is exactly like the beautiful love experienced by horrifically sick individuals who like to diddle the dead. However, if some "hysterical and dishonest" butt pirate gets their precious widdle fee-fee's hurt by equating us with necrophiliacs, that's just the price that must be paid for bravely speaking up.

Apparently, even the people over at Barbwire questioned Biver's shitty screed prior to working up the nerve to publish it. In his attempt to provide full transparency, he notes that someone mentioned in passing that maybe gay love isn't necessarily exactly like necrophilia. This smart man anticipated this spurious accusation and had his defense at the ready.

One complaint I did receive in advance of posting this is that it is wrong to list necrophilia since consent isn’t possible. My answer is simple: consent is possible. It need only be given before the target of affection has passed on. Also, check the list of paraphilias — there are plenty of them where consent is not possible.

Another complaint was that necrophilia is a danger to one’s health. The Centers for Disease Control has some very bad news for you: so is sex between men and sex between women.

Now that Biven has clearly, without a shadow of doubt proven that gay people and dead-people lovers are all ingredients in the same pervert soup, he gets to the nuts and bolts of why he felt the need to write his dire warning. It is because of those slippery slopes, you see. Necrophiliacs are poised to demand their day in the sun, their rightful place at the American table, just like the filthy gays have done. He's just providing "a public service in order to help society prepare for the future."

With his filthy tongue planted firmly in his cheek, Biven goes on to list 20 ludicrous bullet points illustrating all the frightening scenarios coming down the pike at the hands of the newly emboldened necrophiliacs. In his effort to denigrate my community as viciously as possible, he turns into quite the comedian. Some lowlights:

•How will society respond to a future well-funded marriage “equality” effort for those in necrophilia relationships?
•How will schools respond to requests to start pro-necrophilia clubs to support students who experience necrophilia feelings and who seek to come out of the necrophilia closet?
•Will necrophiliacs join “pride parades”? (Then again, anyone who has seen pictures of those events will have to assume a few are already in attendance.)
Stop, John, my sides!

To close, Mr. Biver, you looked into your smudgy crystal ball and saw us coming a mile away. After doing a quick search, I do believe this is the first of the "hysterical and dishonest posts which claim that “ and John Biver say that homosexual sex is the equivalent of sex with the dead.” I hope there are many more to come, because that is exactly what you have done. As a result, you need to be shamed from polite society for the remainder of your miserable days.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site