Skip to main content

As anybody who follows elections on Daily Kos knows, California's current top two primary system has the unfortunate effect of allowing one party to get two of its candidates on the general election ballot simply because the other party had too many primary candidates splitting the vote.  In 2012, this allowed republicans to win California's blue-leaning 31st district by having two republicans and 4 democrats on the primary ballot.  In the 2014 cycle, we only narrowly avoided repeating this blunder in the 31st district. And two republicans advanced to the general the purple trending 25th district (thereby shutting democrats out of what looked to be a competitive race).

The top two system nevertheless does have some merit. It eliminates the spoiler effect inherent in a first-past-the-post system, without having to rely on runoffs (which depress turn out) or ranked-choice voting (which has tended to be confusing and unpopular with voters). In truly uncompetitive districts, it probably does democracy a service to have two members of the same party on the ballot, as this prevents the general election from becoming a meaningless "coronation", with all the real action being in the low-turnout primary.

With the intention of allowing two candidates of the same party to advance in districts that are truly uncompetitive, but preventing this outcome in competitive districts, I propose the following fix to the top two primary system:

1. All candidates appear on the same primary ballot with all registered voters being able to vote for only one candidate.

2. The candidate who receives the most votes advances to the general election.

3. If candidates who share the leading candidate's party affiliation have together received at least X % of the vote, the second place candidate advances to the general.

4. In all other cases, the top candidate who does not share the leading candidate's party affiliation advances to the general.

The effect of this proposal would depend considerably on the value chosen for X. If X=95, then nearly every general election race will have candidates from different parties.  If X=60, the race would have to be fairly close before anybody but the top two candidates would advance.  For example, in the 25th district, the republican party collectively received 64.7% of the vote (presumably due to low turnout). You could even choose X=50, on the grounds that if a party receives 50% of the vote they've won.

I would personally go with a value in the 60-70 range.  This would still allow dem on dem or rep on rep contests in truly uncompetitive districts, but force a "real" contest everywhere else.


If this system were adopted, what percentage of the total vote would you want a single party to have to recieve before only its top two candidates would advance to the general election?

14%1 votes
14%1 votes
0%0 votes
42%3 votes
14%1 votes
14%1 votes

| 7 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site