Skip to main content

(Crossposted from Liberal America)

If you actually watch Fox News (I generally don't, it's like voluntarily drinking Drano), then you might have been watching the other day when "America's Newsroom" anchor Patti Ann Browne decided to educate her viewers about the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. It was just like being in history class -- and like many history classes, Professor Browne left a few key items out. As in pretty much anything that would counter the narrative that "Obummer caused the problem in Eye-rack."

Fox News: Not News, but Propaganda

As most people who read Liberal America know, Fox News is not a news provider. It is a propaganda organ for far-right interests, and the "news" it presents is massaged, stacked, racked and packed to provide the maximum impact for the oligarchical and right-wing fringe interests it represents. Whether it's trashing President Obama, promoting militias, or cheerleading for the Tea Party, everything Fox News does is to serve an agenda. No other major national news outlet does this, regardless of your conservative friends' attempts to claim that "MSNBC is just like Fox for liberals." No, it isn't. MSNBC provides news and opinion with a progressive slant. Most European news outlets use this model of "news with a view." CNN does the same thing, with a rightward slant -- though given its recent coverage of school shootings, it may be skewing into the area of actual propaganda purveyor. Fox News is more in line with the Soviet-era Pravda, which not only slanted the news it reported to fit its agenda (in its case, attempting to paint the Soviet government in the best light possible and to denigrate the government's enemies and domestic opponents), but did not report events that made the Soviet government look bad, and falsified its reporting when it suited its purposes. Fox routinely does this:

After brief "blurb" coverage in the hours after the incident, Fox refused to report on the Las Vegas police murders, almost certainly because every element of that story went against everything it promotes.

Fox routinely misidentifies errant Republicans as Democrats, as with pedophile Mark Foley and adulterer Mark Sanford.

Fox actually filed a lawsuit to legally protect its right to lie to its audience. It won.

Fox's History Lesson

Which brings us back to Patti Ann Browne and her Iraq history lesson. Nothing she said was incorrect on its face; it's what she left out that's interesting. The agenda here is to give the Fox audience just enough information about the history of the Iraq occupation to believe the current spin that Obama is responsible for the violence breaking out in Iraq. As we, and most of Fox's viewership knows, a radical group called ISIS has seized control of the Iraqi city of Mosul, and Iraq's hardline Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki wants the US to carry out airstrikes against ISIS targets. But how is all of this Obama's fault? Let's follow along.

Browne starts by telling viewers that Congress authorized the Bush administration to invade Iraq, and President Bush signed the AUMF that green-lighted the US invasion.

She then notes the March 2003 "shock and awe" invasion, "after the deadline for Saddam Hussein's exile expired."

"Fast forward to 2007," she says. "President Bush announced the surge, the deployment of 30,000 additional troops to Iraq."

"And then, the end. 2011. President Obama announcing the end of the Iraq War and saying troops will be withdrawn by the end of that year."

Did you see how quickly Browne took us down the rabbit hole? From the outset, it was Congress, not the Bush administration, who leveraged the US into going to war -- Bush just signed the paperwork. The second snippet placed the entire blame for the invasion on Saddam Hussein's refusal to voluntarily step down from power. Then she blithely skipped over four years of disaster to the vaunted "Bush surge," and then bopped over four more years until that Kenyan dictator dude yanked all the Americans out of Iraq -- playing right into the hands of those bad old Islamist radicals, who were just waiting for Obama to cut and run so they could start tearing it up again.

The Real Deal

The reality is far, far different from Browne's little Iraq fantasy.

Patti Ann did not bother to remind her viewers that Bush had declared his intention to invade Iraq as early as 1999, or that his future administration's "number one priority" was Hussein's ouster. She doesn't mention the Bush administration's huge, and hugely successful, propaganda campaign to convince Congress and the American people that Iraq posed a dire and imminent threat to US safety, which culminated in Colin Powell's toweringly duplicitous performance at the UN that convinced all but a few Congressional holdouts to give Bush the authority to get his ya-yas out in Iraq.

She also left a few things out from during the war itself. Case in point: Bush's arrogant, stagecrafted "Mission Accomplished" declaration from May 2003. The media, even those lefties at MSNBC, fell over themselves to praise Bush and his "manly attribute," but the mission, if it was the stabilization and democritization of Iraq, was not accomplished. (If the mission was to rescue Dick Cheney's Halliburton from bankruptcy, however, it was spectacularly successful.)

She didn't tell her viewers that the Bush/Cheney allegations that Hussein had "weapons of mass destruction" were proven false by a thorough, diligent investigation that showed both Hussein and the Bush administration had repeatedly lied to their respective citizenries about Iraq's weapons capabilities.

She failed to note that the CIA and Bush administration officials colluded with known liar and political operator Ahmad Chalabi, who turned out to be an Iranian spy. Chalabi's propaganda was integral in convincing America that the only way to "solve" the Iraq "situation" was to invade Iraq and overthrow Hussein.

She didn't mention the Abu Ghraib debacle, that resulted in 11 US soldiers serving prison sentences for war crimes.

She didn't tell her audience that in June 2004, the US transferred the formal sovereignty of Iraq to an Iraqi coalition. The US "government," led by corporate stooge L. Paul Bremer, slunk out of Baghdad in the middle of the night.

She didn't talk about the array of Bush administration officials, from Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who resigned in disgrace for their incompetence and systematic lying about every aspect of the invasion and occupation.

She forgot to mention that in November 2008, after Obama won the election but before he took office, the US signed a Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government that mandated the end of 2011 as the date by which American troops must leave Iraq.

She even failed to tell her audience that as late as June 2011, Obama opposed the withdrawal of American forces from Iraq, but was unable to convince the Iraqis to let the Americans stay past the December 2011 target date.

If this is all news to you -- for most Kossacks, it is well-worn history -- go watch Rachel Maddow's outstanding hour-long documentary, "Hubris," based on the book of the same name by Michael Isikoff and David Corn. The video and the book are great places to start.

Truth Overcomes Propaganda, with Some Effort

So why is this important? You've spent more time reading this article than bouncy little Patti Ann spent showing you her revisionist history lesson.

Because this is how Fox News persuades its viewers, other mainstream media outlets from the New York Times to NBC News, American lawmakers, and American citizens to buy into the garbage that it has choked the body politic with for twenty years. The storyline here is one that Fox has been trumpeting in one form or another almost since the first Obama inauguration: that the Iraq invasion and occupation was going great guns until Democrats took over Congress, and it went entirely to hell when Obama became president.

This is the function of propaganda: to persuade people that the situation is fundamentally different than it actually is, and then have discussions and decisions based on that corrupted view of the situation.

In Fox reality, the entire failure of the Iraq invasion and occupation belongs to Obama and the Congressional Democrats. Bush, Cheney, and the Bush-era neocons had Iraq under control, they say. Iraq was one tiny step away from moving into a Jeffersonian democracy that would bring peace, prosperity, and an abject subservience to corporate America to that benighted nation, until Obama and the Democrats derailed everything by being cut-and-run cowards with secret desires to see the terrorists win. Nothing is further from the truth.

This is why we cannot ignore Fox News and the other heavy hitters in the right's propaganda machine. If we are not aware of their ongoing efforts to corrupt, bowdlerize, and abuse the political and social discourse in this country, then we cannot counter them with facts and righteous outrage. And they must be countered. The assumption that "if we ignore them, they will lose effectiveness and eventually go away" is entirely wrong. The American left clutched its collective pearls and ignored Rush Limbaugh for decades, while he transformed himself -- with the aid of several members of the corporate oligarchy -- from a yuk-yuk sports broadcaster into the de facto head of the Republican Party. Limbaugh, Fox, Michael Savage, and so many others are directly responsible for helping transform America from a comfortable middle-class economic powerhouse into a decaying oligarchy dominated by a frenzy over guns, abortion and absolutist corporate power whose majority of citizens are teetering (or have already toppled) into third-world beggardom.

And to a certain extent, we let it happen. It's on us to keep it from continuing, and to reverse the trend, if we can.

Knowledge is power. Ignorance is power, too, if you're the one manipulating the ignorant. Josef Stalin knew that very well. So did Joseph Goebbels. And so does Fox News's Roger Ailes. Now you know, if you didn't already. The next step you take is up to you.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Well of course (9+ / 0-)

    According to Fox Nooz, Dubya's reign consisted of two parts: Clinton's Fault and Obama's Fault.

    What's more, Fox Nooz viewers have no sense of history, so they find it safe to comingle the two. After all, everything, in the end, is "Obama's Fault."

    And God said, "Let there be light"; and with a Big Bang, there was light. And God said "Ow! Ow My eyes!" and in a flash God separated light from darkness. "Whew! Now that's better. Now where was I. Oh yea . . ."

    by Pale Jenova on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 05:26:48 AM PDT

  •  Fox refused to report on Vegas murders? (5+ / 0-)

    Trust me: had the two killers been far left wing nuts, as conservatives are predictably trying to portray them, Fox would STILL be talking non-stop about Las Vegas!!!!!

  •  How do you get FOX to bite on a story they (0+ / 0-)

    don't want to cover?

    We all know that the real story of Iraq is still to come out. How shall we do that?  What about buying into the myth just a little bit to make them think the whole thing has clear sailing?

    FOX is a media organization in the sense that it shares the common penchant for determining on its own what to cover and what not. If a topic is to be covered, the editors have to think it was their idea.

    http://hannah.smith-family.com

    by hannah on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 05:44:49 AM PDT

  •  I agree with you if you take out (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    thestructureguy

    "to a certain extent" and "if we can" because it really is:

    And... we let it happen. It's on us to keep it from continuing, and to reverse the trend".
    What I want to see/hear/read now, is Americans talking about how to reverse the trend, to stop it in its tracks. I see/hear/read a lot of justified whinging about Fox; now I challenge every one of you to start talking about how this can be accomplished.

    Maybe this article would be a good starting point:

    Shouting Fire in America

    Please note that lamps in the MAGIC LAMP EMPORIUM are on a genie time-share program so there may be a slight delay in wish fulfillment. (◕‿◕)

    by Mopshell on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 05:47:03 AM PDT

  •  Ailes,Murdoch, and FOX are guilty of Sedition... (3+ / 0-)

    ...the giant Republican elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about.

    Dudehisattva...

    "Generosity, Ethics, Patience, Effort, Concentration, and Wisdom"

    by Dood Abides on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 06:26:56 AM PDT

  •  The Republicans are all over this buffoonery (3+ / 0-)

    McCain wanted to put Bush's clowns back at the Defense Department because, you know, the morons who caused the mess are the perfect ones to turn to when it all collapses.

    I don't think Obama handled Iraq perfectly (pretending that the Maliki government ever had a prayer of keeping the country together was silly), but when someone transfers to you a house that's going up in flames and it burns down after he hands it to you, yeah not really the fault of the second guy. smh

  •  Fox controller Murdoch...per Juan Cole today (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Black Max

    Blair’s version of the Labour Party was a surrender of Labour principles to billionaire backers like press lord Rupert Murdoch, who ministers say was a ghostly presence at all cabinet meetings. Murdoch wanted the Iraq War, convinced it would bring more petroleum online (the international embargo of Saddam’s oil would end if he was overthrown). Murdoch predicted $14 a barrel (Brent crude is $113 now). Murdoch’s tabloids routinely hacked into people’s private telephone messages, and used this intelligence to get scoops and possibly to blackmail people. Murdoch threatens politicians with bad press if they defy him.

    The only satisfying part of this sordid destruction of British democracy and the domestic and international rule of law is that Murdoch had taken a younger Chinese wife, who developed a thing for Blair,  breaking up Murdoch’s marriage (Blair denies an affair but they secretly spent weekends together).

    "It ain't over till it's over."-Yogi Berra

    by mock38 on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 06:55:48 AM PDT

  •  Whitewash much bigger than Fox News (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Black Max, StillAmused

    The Iraq whitewash might start with Fox News, but goes to every TV network and newspaper in the US. Even Kos is derelict in reporting on what we really know about Bush era war crimes today, thanks to top whistleblowers like Lawrence Wilkerson.

    The bottom line is that the establishment wants to avoid this war crimes debate left and right, because there are enough known knowns today to really nail Cheney which puts a big ugly ball in the court of the Democrats and liberals in power.

    Here is the reporting that sums it up, first broken on Democracy Now! by Amy Goodman with Glenn Greenwald on as guest. Colin Powell's chief of staff basically said he would testify that George Tenet and Dick Cheney's office squelched the key communications that showed Curveball was lying.

    By preventing this crucial dissent, President Bush and Colin Powell were "insulated" from the truth that the whole WMD thing was made up from whole cloth. Thus, Congress, the press and the American people were also kept in the dark.

    But we know now what happened, so the fact that this story isn't big, big, big, is a failure of the indie media. Please read the case laid out by Wilkerson and tell me if I'm wrong - since when is deceiving Congress about WMD no big deal? Why hasn't Wilkerson's offer to testify been explored in the least?

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

  •  Gutierrez (D, IL) set the record straight on ABC (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jj32, Black Max

    He reminded viewers that a sectarian war has raged in Iraq for 100 years and that Bush didn't know a Suuni from a Shiite. He also reminded us that the Bush administration said we'd be welcomed as liberators and that the war would pay for itself. Neither was true.

    Gutierrez voted against the war.

    Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity. Horace Mann (and btw, the bike in kayakbiker is a bicycle)

    by Kayakbiker on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 08:12:41 AM PDT

  •  Hate to say it, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sunbro

    but America deserves — and needs — Fox.

    It's group therapy for assholes who don't pay attention to their own lying eyes and can't remember what passed before those lying eyes any further back than last week.

  •  It's a dying brand. (0+ / 0-)

    Fox News viewers are dying out. Fox News faux outrage is antiquated, their spin ludicrous. It'll take a long time, and oceans of digital ink to keep countering their lies, but that whole shit show is on the wrong side of history.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site