Skip to main content

Senator Rand Paul weighed in on the deteriorating situation in Iraq. He expressed surprise that we were opposing ISIS in Iraq because we were essentially allied with them in the fight against Bashir al-Assad in Syria. “We are on both sides of two different wars,” he said. His tone throughout was one of exasperation. That, of course, is the standard tone for young libertarians. They’re exasperated that the rest of us just don’t get it. It all seems so obvious to them, and they wonder why it’s not so obvious to us.

I wonder if Senator Paul realizes that we are on the same side as Iran in our support for the current Iraqi government.

There’s a certain naivete to Paul’s statements.  He apparently doesn’t realize that throughout history, the United States has been allied with conflicting forces or countries? We still have, for example, diplomatic relations with both (Communist) China, and Taiwan (or the People’s Republic of China). We often champion positions that are at odds with our diplomatic relations. We proclaim, for example, the view that we champion democracy throughout the world, but one of our major allies in the Middle East is Saudi Arabia, which is a monarchy where the ruling family has a tight grip on power.  

Such naivete might be charming in a teenage libertarian, but it’s disconcerting in a man who’s the leading contender for the Republican Presidential nomination.

It’s also further evidence of how libertarians are disconnected from reality. They believe in a version of the world that has simply never existed. It’d be nice if international relations were clear cut, and if the U.S. could have consistent policies and positions, but that is simply not the world we live in.    

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Don't worry, his position will change (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    if he can find a different angle to slam Obama and/or Hillary with.

    If I ran this circus, things would be DIFFERENT!

    by CwV on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 09:01:15 AM PDT

  •  It Would've Been 10x Cheaper for Billionaires of (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    the 50's/60's to have invested in setting up a libertarian town or province somewhere largely government-free in the world to serve as an example that would inform and motivate society to adopt their philosophy, than to have spent all these decades on propaganda and state, local and national legislating, thinktanks, fundamentalist religion and more trying to force the US to do it.

    Any big business of the last 2/3 century could explain the value of test markets.

    Unless of course know in advance that your scheme can't work as advertised.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 09:02:14 AM PDT

  •  "Leading contender..." (0+ / 0-)

    You slay me, diarist!

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 09:29:13 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site