Skip to main content

An unsolicited email newsletter by ClashDaily has started showing up in my inbox. Normally I ignore, unsubscribe or report unwanted spam, but I have decided to let this one live for awhile to better understand their editorial worldview.

One blog entry offers "5 Questions To Smack A Liberal Progressive With" and cites a recent post from the blog of Allen West:

Here is my response to the five questions offered, below the fold.

1. If former President George W. Bush was un-American for adding $4 trillion to the national debt, then what is President Barack Hussein Obama who is on his way to adding $8 trillion — and still has two more years to go? Yep, under Obama the national debt has risen from $10.67 trillion to almost $17.5 trillion.
1. A one minute Internet search yields conflicting data. For example, this. I'll assume for now that my data is no better or worse than your data. It is well documented however that the GWB tax cut in the run-up to war is a huge reason for the rapid swing from Clinton-era surpluses to debt in both Bush and Obama administrations. So my question is, does Congressional leadership have the political will to restore tax levels to where they were in the late 90s, still very low by historical standards?
2. If as Obama states, “we leave no man behind,” then what of Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi, Pastor Saeed Abedini and Kenneth Bae — not to mention still-imprisoned Meriam Yahia Ibrahim – who had her chains removed after giving birth to her daughter, Maya? (And by the way, she is still under a death sentence under Sharia law for marrying a Christian). Nah, those folks don’t help Obama’s political agenda and certainly aren’t as important as recognizing illegal immigrant children “dreamers” at the White House.
2. I'll grant you this one. Our country can work more effectively toward releasing all U.S. citizens who are detained internationally. If any of them are determined to have violated legally recognized laws, that can be addressed in U.S. courts. Question, who should we trade to Mexico for the release of Sgt. Tahmooressi, for example?
3. When the average price of gasoline hit $2.50 a gallon, liberals and their media accomplices went apoplectic (you may have to define that word to a liberal friend) on George W. Bush. Why so silent now, when it’s $3.67?
3. The real cost of gas is closer to $10 per gallon than to any of the numbers you've cited. The Obama administration has addressed the need for renewable energy development. I'll add the need for honest accounting: Military costs to defend oil access must be counted as oil costs. Otherwise this is enormous social welfare that U.S. taxpayers are giving to multinational oil companies in exchange for keeping gas prices artificially low - and they're still making huge profits.
4. If the late and former President Richard Nixon resigned over a bad case of “breaking and entering” (and the liberal media made a big hoopla over that), what does it take for Barack Hussein Obama to consider the same? Or does the color of skin trump content of character in America now? By the way, I’m planning on my computer crashing next year around tax return time.
4. A President breaking and entering is a non-partisan issue. Having grown up during Watergate, I do not recall people from any party praising what Nixon did as a good idea. Furthermore, the GWB administration opened the doors to undisclosed wiretapping post 9-11. I am dismayed that President Obama did not reign this in when he first took office, and I will not give future presidents a fee pass for continuing to ignore or expand the practice.

Like everything touched by the Internet, privacy in communication has been inevitably changed. Our nations's next "moon shot" could be an effort to understand and reconsider every aspect of privacy laws that served us from the birth of America through about 1995. We need to return to the underlying tenets that ensure individual rights to security and privacy as a starting point.

5. If it is racist to disagree with the proven failed policies of Barry Soetoro, oops, I mean Barack Hussein Obama, then what is it when liberal progressives disrespect, dismiss, denigrate, demean, disparage, discredit and seek to destroy black conservative Republicans? Funny, all those “D” words come from the Democrat party. Don’t believe me, just look for the responses to this post from liberal progressives (so predictable).
5. Are you open to accepting that your snark about president Obama's name disqualifies the question and may invite the kinds of negative comments you are complaining about? I say "invite" because it's still someone's choice in how they choose to respond.

Allen, I know you only through your documented personal history and what I've read in the media over the past several years. If I acknowledge as a starting place that I really do not know you, and therefore cannot write you off as some stereotype that I disagree with, will you do the same for me and others in return?

If your answer is yes, then let's consider your question about disparagement of minority conservatives. If a person is both acting in their integrity and a minority, the only thing I choose to see is the integrity. When I meet someone who ignores the integrity of others due to racial prejudice, or who acts without integrity regardless of race, then it is appropriate for me to respond to that, through my integrity.

Rather than offer a general statement about liberals and blacks, can you offer specific people and circumstances? Help me get to know a few of the cases you're most concerned about, and I'll respectfully consider what you're saying.

And finally, this:

Now, just so you’re aware, be careful when asking these questions to be outside the range of spittle and frothing of the mouth. As well, stand clear so as not to be struck by a liberal progressives wild arm-flinging tantrums as they throw themselves on the floor in a mad rage. These are the telltale symptoms of liberals exposed to the truth — similar to exposing vampires to light. But know that this reaction affirms you are right on the issues and confirms the liberal progressive inability to intellectually respond.
Allen, you prep your readers to assume that no dialog with any liberal progressives is possible. Does this mean that the question poser is encouraged to ask the questions, invite anger, then either get agreement or walk away from any disagreement without further dialog? Why ask questions while anticipating a non-answer? If your intention is to have a dialog, I respectfully ask for your consideration of responses you may hear with an open mind and an open heart.

Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  He's using number 4 for the IRS business. (4+ / 0-)

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White -6.00, -5.18

    by zenbassoon on Thu Jun 19, 2014 at 10:29:49 PM PDT

  •  Regarding # (6+ / 0-)

    The question:

    2. If as Obama states, “we leave no man behind,” then what of Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi, Pastor Saeed Abedini and Kenneth Bae
    Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi is not a prisoner of war (nor are the others listed, but I am addressing only Tahmooressi).  It appears that Tahmooressi got arrested in Mexico for bringing in guns and ammunition that are illegal in Mexico.  According to an article published Friday in the Tijuana newspaper ZETATIJUANA.
    Tahmooressi was arrested on April 1, 2014 when he crossed into Mexico carrying a loaded .45 caliber pistol, AR-15 type assault weapon and a 12 gauge shotgun, as well as extra ammo clips and ammunition for all three weapons.+

    He was charged with being in possession of firearms “reserved exclusively for military use” and faces from 6 to 21 years in Federal prison in Mexico if convicted.

    This is from a blog by Mexico Trucker Online

    The story that he ended up in Mexico seems to be contradicted by a hotel receipt indication that he booked a room the afternoon he arrived in Mexico.

    The President of the United States is not obligated to get the release of a US citizen who broke the law in a foreign country.  It should also be noted, that he was traveling in a vehicle with loaded weapons easily accessible.  I read somewhere that this is illegal in California, so he could have been arrested here in the US for having those 3 weapons (loaded) plus 400 rounds of spare ammunition in his vehicle.

    Nothing close to the Bergdahl trade.

  •  Thanks for unraveling those tangled thoughts. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Rashaverak, Jon Sitzman, aimeehs

    His closing statement suggests to me that he has never actually spoken with a liberal.



    Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary? . . . and respect the dignity of every human being.

    by Wee Mama on Fri Jun 20, 2014 at 04:42:47 AM PDT

    •  It's funny how the insults people hurl at others (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      aimeehs

      sometimes wind up being sort of a self-portrait.

      If there's one thing I've consistently noticed about heavy-duty conservatives (I'm just talking street people now, not politicians), it's that anger is their first fallback position when they start losing an argument on the merits.  Now getting angry at an obstinate and rude argument-opponent is one thing; I'm awful about that myself.  But that's not what I'm talking about.  Conservatives get angry to put their opponent on the defensive.  More liberal thinkers in particular tend to be very sensitive to the moods and emotions of others; we (if I may include myself in the group) also tend to be natural negotiators, and in some case conciliators.  Conservatives - or their opinion shapers - figured out long ago that by "getting angry" they could suddenly make the argument into a personal emotional spat instead of a discussion of fact and logic, and then use that change against the liberal opponent.

      Staying calm and laughing at a conservative who tries to go nuclear to get you to buckle is VERY satisfying, though.  The anger often becomes real.  The whole bit about spittle and arm-waving is particularly funny.  It can happen.

      Not all people are human; not all humans are people.

      by Jon Sitzman on Fri Jun 20, 2014 at 07:54:19 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site