Skip to main content

On Saturday June 21, at the South Dakota Republican Party’s annual convention in Rapid City, delegates voted 191-176 in favor of a resolution calling for the impeachment of President Barack Obama.

According to Sioux Falls Argus Leader and Huffington Post articles, the Resolution states that President Obama has "violated his oath of office in numerous ways", specifically citing the trade of five Taliban detainees for POW Bowe Bergdahl, the much-hyped campaign promise that people would be able to keep their existing health insurance under the ACA, and the recent EPA proposal curbing emissions from coal power plants. "Therefore, be it resolved that the South Dakota Republican Party calls on our U.S. Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of the United States," the Resolution reads.

Sponsor of the resolution, Allen Unruh of Sioux Falls, claimed he had "a thick book on impeachable offenses of the President" and called on South Dakota to "send a symbolic message that liberty shall be the law of the land." In lockstep with Tea Party ideologues, his interpretation of “liberty” appears to be people, policies and laws I agree with.

These, of course, are not impeachable offences but the frustration of the Right’s failure to despoil Obama’s Presidency has led them to concoct a vengeful alternate universe where the reality of their angry impotency becomes reinvented as a potent force to extirpate all that they hate. They are the heroes in their own daydreams.

However, he did get one thing right. Impeachment would be merely “symbolic”. It takes a two-thirds majority in the Senate to remove a president from office and there’s no chance the Republicans could ever muster that kind of majority in the Midterms. At best they’re hoping for a 51/47 majority over the Democrats, with the 2 Independents making up the full 100 Senators, and it's becoming increasing unlikely that they'll even manage that.

Nevertheless, a symbolic gesture would apparently suffice for the angry but impotent Right-Wingers who are desperate to show America just how angry and frustrated they are. Nor were they happy that the vote against the Resolution was so high. Delegate David Wheeler stated for the “nay” case:

"I believe we should not use the power of impeachment for political purposes," Wheeler said. "By doing this, we would look petty, like we can't achieve our political goals through the political process."
That didn’t go down well with Delegate Larry Klipp who said matters go beyond mere political disagreements with Obama:
"If anyone in this room cannot see the horrendous, traitorous scandals run by the Obama administration, I will pray for you," Klipp said.
But threatening the nay-sayers with prayer, a favorite tactic of the Christian Right, is ineffectual against those whose reasoning aligns more with reality than fabricated fancy and who may even suspect that a move to impeach the President would backfire on the GOP disastrously.

Even Rep Kristi Noem, South Dakota's lone delegate in the House of Representatives, was described as “cool” to the Resolution. Brittany Comins, Noem's spokesperson, said:

"The congresswoman currently believes the best way for Congress to hold the President accountable is to continue aggressive committee oversight and investigations into the administration's actions like the ongoing VA scandal, the targeting of conservative groups by the IRS, Benghazi, and the recent Taliban prisoner exchange."
That’s right, Ms Noem, it’s much safer to go with the current losing strategy than to initiate the Articles of Impeachment which, in comparison to the failed House investigations, would be like diving off a cliff rather than tripping on the bottom step over and over again.

The Huffinton Post concluded their article with:

Talk of impeaching the president even made a return to Capitol Hill this week, when, after a discussion about immigration reform, Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Penn.) claimed that the House could "probably" impeach Obama if the matter was brought to the floor.

"You know, the problem is, you know, what do you do for those that say, 'Impeach him for breaking the laws or bypassing the laws'?" Barletta said in a June 16 interview. "You know, could that pass in the House? It probably could. Is the majority of the American people in favor of impeaching the president? I'm not sure."

Well I’m very sure, Mr Barletta, the American people wouldn’t like it at all and the backlash would be swift and absolute at the ballot box. I doubt anything could energize Democratic voters more. So please proceed, Republicans, stop dithering and get on with it. Let's find out once and for all what the country really thinks of impeaching the President.


Originally posted to Mopshell on Mon Jun 23, 2014 at 04:30 AM PDT.

Also republished by PostHuffPost: Connection-Conversation-Community and South Dakota Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site