Skip to main content

The question marks are definitely called for, but the cause of marriage equality in the Sportsman's Paradise took a big step yesterday. Forward, backward or sideways is still unclear.

US District Court judge Martin Feldman, hearing arguments on a full faith and credit case (can couples legally married in other states claim married status in Louisiana?), "threw a curveball" to proponents and opponents of marriage when he announced that he would rule not only on the issue brought before the court, but on the right of same-sex couples to marry in the state.

Announcing that he wasn't interested in tackling the subject "piecemeal," Feldman said he intended to rule on the right of same-sex couples to marry, strictly forbidden under state law.

From the Advocate:

“I feel uncomfortable resolving some issues one way or the other and not all the issues one way or another,” Feldman said, asking for additional briefs within three weeks but putting off a decision about whether to hear more oral arguments.

The judge’s decision will likely mean a short delay in any ruling on the recognition issue, but it could greatly speed up a decision on whether same-sex couples can get a marriage licence in Louisiana. Under the court’s original instructions, now moot, lawyers for both sides were to argue over the recognition issue, allow the full appeals process to play out and only then take up the case of a gay couple who attempted to get a marriage license in New Orleans and got turned down.

Another outstanding issue before Feldman is whether Louisiana is violating the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech by forcing married same-sex couples to list themselves as single on tax returns.

Instead of taking on each question separately, Feldman appears ready to issue one ruling on all of them, though he dropped no conclusive hints about which way he might be leaning.

"No conclusive hints," indeed. Feldman's grilling of both sides, and his insistence that he has yet to make up his mind on the issues, leaves advocates on both sides wondering whether his rulings will be cause for cheer or groan. (Do read through the Advocate article; it has a lot of the back and forth between Feldman and the parties, including what appears to be a dismissal of the Loving case as precedent).

Whatever the results of this case, Feldman's decision to tackle the whole hog make this a bigger deal than anyone expected when the hearing convened.

Stay tuned.

Originally posted to Crashing Vor on Thu Jun 26, 2014 at 08:15 AM PDT.

Also republished by Louisiana Kossacks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site