Skip to main content

Dare we hope?  That is the question on my mind when I think about finally gaining our full freedom and liberty as gay people in America.  Every week seems to bring more good news on the marriage equality front.  But how long will it last before a court rules against us?

In 1996 when Bill Clinton signed DOMA it was a stab in the heart that I will never forgive him for.  And ten years ago when state after state was enshrining our inequality into their Constitutions I despaired that we would ever see true freedom in my lifetime.

But then things started to change ever so slowly.  Then last June the dam burst with the two Supreme Court rulings.        

More below...

I know the big push is to get marriage equality up to the Supreme Court, but I'm not so sure.  The SC is conservative and unpredictable.  They issue rulings that defy all logic (Citizens United, for example).  A "no" from the Supreme Court would be a huge setback and would galvanize the anti-gay movement big time.  States like MS and LA would never approve marriage equality.  

With the supreme Court, we need to remember that they only take about 85 cases a year out of thousands.  They usually won't take a case until there are differing rulings from different Appeals Courts.  And they like to let things play out for awhile in the states.

The hardest thing to do when you see the "promised land" is to be patient and wait.  Yet I think that's what we have to do.  I want case after case won, with a record built up that is undeniable if (or when) it does reach the Supreme Court.  An argument is going to have to be presented to them that they can go for that doesn't do damage to their conservative jurisprudence.  We need to get the best case we can before them.

We should remember the words of Justice Ginsburg on the Roe v Wade ruling.  While she is a supporter of the right to abortion (and I believe marriage equality) she said the Court went too fast and got ahead of America.  So I think it would be a mistake to expect the current Court to issue a "yes" to marriage equality while it's still a controversial issue in many parts of America.  

So patience and full speed ahead in the states is my opinion.  I despise having to go state by state, but I see little option with the current conservative bent of the Supreme Court.

I'm wondering what Ted Olson and David Boies think we should do?  They are the two smartest guys (on our side) who have argued before the Supreme Court.  And they would be the two I would want on a marriage equality case that does go to the Supreme Court.  

It's easy to get caught up in the exuberance of all the rulings in our favor these days.  And it's easy to think that we've got it won.  I'm just not that confident yet.  I've seen too many disappointments and too any setbacks.  We've won only won in 20 states to date, and we're running up against state Constitutions going forward

I will tell you this, when we do win marriage equality nationwide I'm gonna bawl my eyes out for finally seeing freedom in my lifetime.  And then we're gonna have the biggest goddamn celebration we've ever had!

But I still ask:  Dare we hope?  What do you think?

Poll

Dare we hope?

100%6 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes

| 6 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It is not a dare, it is at this point a growing (0+ / 0-)

    inevitability.

    Full disclosure:  I am not GLBTQ, only a friend to the community (as best I am able).  However, I think I am about as fully on your side in this issue as a K6 straight person can be.

    The legal momentum is shifting in our favor on this issue, but FAR more importantly, public opinion HAS shifted.  A strong majority of younger people, even otherwise conservative young people, are neutral or favorably disposed to equal rights for GLBTQ Americans.

    Conservative opinion-shapers and rabble-rousers have dined on the anti-GLBTQ ticket for years, because for all that time much of their base was raised too parochially to do anything but fear and misunderstand "teh gayz" (no slur intended).  A world made more communicative and open by web-aware, instant-access social media doesn't have those social blinders.  Society is waking up, at least in some ways.  The old wolf-criers know they're losing on this issue.  They'll move on within a decade or two.  The paradigm will continue to shift during that time.

    You are winning.  WE are winning (breaking down walls between people makes everyone stronger).  Do dare.  Do believe.  Do be inspired.  Do be active.  And definitely, do keep working for a better tomorrow.  You have got this, and you will see real victories within your lifetime.  I'll raise you a toast when it happens.

    Not all people are human; not all humans are people.

    by Jon Sitzman on Fri Jun 27, 2014 at 07:35:49 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site