Skip to main content

The collapse of the elected institutions of our national leadership have given our unelected institution wide latitude to experiment with one-party rule. Under the guise of Constitutional review, we sometimes see new rights made up out of nothing - and 'laws' issued as judicial 'findings' (ie, decrees which are not themselves subject to review).

That is, we sometimes see the Supreme Court acting as a political body - and it has a marker: a 5 to 4 division, meaning one person decides the law!

This is not a new thing - for example, Dred Scott - and the left is as guilty as the right in regard to judicial overreach (for example, 'right to privacy,' which I cannot find anywhere in my copy of the Constitution though this is actually an exception - a decision that grants a right We the People, not just to Them the Corporations).

Sometimes the Supreme Court can acquit itself rather well... when it focuses on Constitutional issues. And the Roberts court, when it does this, does it remarkably well - even in cases in which I personally don't like the decision, I can agree with their logic.

When the elected institutions of government work for the good of the entire nation, we have legislative redress that can produce better legislation, and even amendments. But the vacuum left by the failure of both the presidency and the congress has ceded an incredible amount of authority to the Supreme Court to act as Politburo - legislating from inside their own buffer zone, and rarely has anyone on the bench had actual political and legislative experience.

And when the Roberts Court does this, they are rather frightening. As it has taken decades to redress some terrible political decisions of earlier liberal courts (the tortured legal insanity known as Roe v. Wade, comes to mind; regardless of how you feel about a woman's [legitimate] right to choose, that was a political decision), it will likewise take decades to wring out the coming nightmares of such one-man decisions that have recently given corporations more rights than actual citizens (Citizens United), invented 'constitutional' gun rights that simply don't exist, and have now created religion-based corporate exemptions to comply with the laws of this country (Hobby Lobby).  

And it doesn't help that 2/5 of the usual majority in that situation are almost certainly mentally ill to a pathological degree. The other 3/5 are obtuse in their utopian naivete.

God save us. It seems unlikely the body politick is going to be able to save itself.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site