Skip to main content

As a matter of faith, some people believe that God can see and hear everything. But as a matter of fact, the U.S. government now has the kind of surveillance powers formerly attributed only to a supreme being.

Top “national security” officials in Washington now have the determination and tech prowess to keep tabs on billions of people. No one elected Uncle Sam to play God. But a dire shortage of democratic constraints has enabled the U.S. surveillance state to keep expanding with steely resolve.

By the time Edward Snowden used NSA documents to expose -- beyond any doubt -- a global surveillance dragnet, the situation had deteriorated so badly because the Bush and Obama administrations were able to dismiss earlier warnings to the public as little more than heresy.

Eight years ago, in the book “State of War,” New York Times reporter James Risen devoted a chapter to the huge expansion of surveillance. A secret decision by President Bush “has opened up America’s domestic telecommunications network to the NSA in unprecedented and deeply troubling new ways, and represents a radical shift in the accepted policies and practices of the modern U.S. intelligence community,” Risen wrote.

Risen added: “The NSA is now tapping into the heart of the nation’s telephone network through direct access to key telecommunications switches that carry many of America’s daily phone calls and e-mail messages.”

More details on the surveillance state came in 2008 with James Bamford’s book “The Shadow Factory,” which illuminated the National Security Agency's program for “eavesdropping on America.” And in August of 2012 -- nearly 10 months before Snowden’s revelations began -- filmmaker Laura Poitras released a mini-documentary on the New York Times website about the NSA’s mass surveillance program.

All three journalists relied on whistleblowers who balked at the NSA’s virtual mission to see and hear everything. Both books (especially “State of War”) depended on information from unnamed sources. The short documentary focused on a public whistleblower -- former NSA executive William Binney, who continues to speak out.

Testifying to a committee of the German parliament in Berlin two weeks ago, Binney -- whose 30 years at the NSA included work as a high-level intelligence official -- said that the NSA has a “totalitarian mentality.”

Days later, speaking at a conference in London, Binney explained: “At least 80 percent of fiber-optic cables globally go via the U.S. This is no accident and allows the U.S. to view all communication coming in. At least 80 percent of all audio calls, not just metadata, are recorded and stored in the U.S. The NSA lies about what it stores.”

Since last summer, a backup source of strength for the voices of Binney, Thomas Drake, Kirk Wiebe and other NSA whistleblowers -- the fact that Snowden has provided the public with NSA documents -- is exactly what has enraged U.S. officials who want to maintain and escalate their surveillance power. Because of those unveiled documents, clarity about what the NSA is really doing has fueled opposition.

NSA surveillance proliferates in a context that goes well beyond spying. The same mentality that claims the right to cross all borders for surveillance -- using the latest technologies to snoop on the most intimate communications and private actions of people across the globe -- is also insisting on the prerogative to cross borders with the latest technologies to kill.

When a drone or cruise missile implements an assumed right to snuff out a life, without a semblance of due process, the presidential emulation of divine intervention is implicit.

But, in military terms, dominating the world is a prohibitively expensive goal. In the digital age, surveillance has emerged as a cost-effective way to extend the U.S. government's global reach and put its intelligence capacities on steroids -- while tens of billions of taxpayer dollars in annual revenues go to corporate contractors servicing the NSA, CIA and other agencies of the military-industrial-surveillance complex.

So the trend line continues to move in the wrong direction. Speaking last month at a news conference that launched (part of the Institute for Public Accuracy, where I work), Binney said that in recent years the NSA’s surveillance activity has “only gotten worse.” He added: “I mean it’s almost in everything that you do. If you do anything electronically, they’re in it and they’re watching you.”

The information being collected is so vast that NSA operatives face a huge challenge of figuring out how to sift through it on such a large scale -- “because they have to manually look at this data,” Binney said. “But the point is, they’re setting the stage for this to continue to the point where everybody could be monitored almost constantly throughout the day. That is an oppressive, suppressive state.”

Since last summer, revelations about NSA programs have been so profuse and complex that it’s difficult to gain an overview, to see the surveillance state’s toxic forest for the digital trees. But the macro picture has to do with a mind-blowing agenda for monitoring the people of the world.

“For me, the most significant revelation is the ambition of the United States government and its four English-speaking allies to literally eliminate privacy worldwide, which is not hyperbole,” journalist Glenn Greenwald said at a news conference three months ago. “The goal of the United States government is to collect and store every single form of electronic communication that human beings have with one another and give themselves the capacity to monitor and analyze those communications.”

Such a goal, formerly reserved for the more fundamentalist versions of God, is now firmly entrenched at the top of the U.S. government -- and at the top of corporate America. As Greenwald pointed out, “There almost is no division between the private sector and the NSA, or the private sector and the Pentagon, when it comes to the American ‘national security’ state. They really are essentially one.”

Now that’s the kind of monotheism the world can do without.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Nope (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Don midwest

    God doesn't collect information on you but not hire enough people to sift through the data. Only the devil uses software to search for key terrorist related words in the data that's been collected.

    And what about the atheists? Do they get to opt out?

    What about people like me who just don't give a fuck one way or the other but would like to use the NSA data to recover the sruff I lost when my computer crashed? This could be mutually beneficial. The NSA and Google could merge and finally defeat Apple. Only zombie Steve Jobs can save us but no one has developed the app for that.

    I sing praises in the church of nonsense, but in my heart I'm still an atheist, demanding sense of all things.

    by jbou on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 02:57:34 AM PDT

    •  Well luckily... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      blueoasis, Joieau

      there are many other people that do

      give a fuck one way or the other
      and will hopefully reign in this non-sense to your benefit.  It's amazing how people who don't value their rights like to offer them up for all of us with a shrug and a spit.  

      The most un-convincable man is the one whose paycheck depends on remaining unconvinced. -- H. L. Mencken

      by kharma on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 05:02:01 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Yes it does. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    blueoasis, Joieau, TracieLynn

    But the NSA scandal, I would submit, is at best a marginal part of that. The US instead displays Old Testament levels of hypocrisy: "Thou shalt not kill ... but I, on the other hand, can totes wipe out a city which pisses me off even when they don't know they're pissing me off."

    (I was reminded of this, for example, by Kerry's rant over Ukraine regarding how impermissible it was for a country in the 21st century to invade another country over false pretenses. True, but really, pot meets kettle.)

    Iuris praecepta sunt haec: Honeste vivere, alterum non laedere, suum cuique tribuere. - Ulpian, Digestae 1, 3

    by Dauphin on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 03:32:20 AM PDT

  •  Weberian bureaucrats w/new technology justified by (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kharma, blueoasis, Don midwest, Joieau

    American exceptionalism

    --which is somewhat of a religion even apart from its expressly religious elements.

  •  A Lot of these Forces are Global Not American (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Don midwest, Joieau

    which is where some of the resources and capabilities come from.

    We've also got a lot of global money helping stage and elect our government.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 05:20:02 AM PDT

  •  What I want to know is does the NSA (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    have a Santa complex?  He knows everything too.

  •  (Old Joke Alert!!!) So this guy is being shown (0+ / 0-)

    around heaven by St. Peter, and they come to a massive room, like the chateau in Paths of Glory.  In the center of the room, a great man is seated on a throne of gold.  He's wearing an american flag suit, with a tall blue hat.  He's holding a copy of the US Constitution and an AR-15.  The guy asks St. Peter, "Who the fuck is that??"

    St. Pete responds:  "Oh that's God. He thinks he's Uncle Sam."

    Please know I am not rude. I cannot rec anything from this browser. When I rec or post diaries I am a guest at some exotic locale's computer. Ayn is the bane!

    by Floyd Blue on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 07:41:44 AM PDT

  •  You wrote: "When a drone or cruise missile... (0+ / 0-)

    ...implements an assumed right to snuff out a life, without a semblance of due process, the presidential emulation of divine intervention is implicit."

    So, are you hopping aboard the "Impeach Obama" bandwagon, then?

    Oh, that's right. You don't engage the community. All you do is write hit-and-run Obama-bashing diaries and then skedaddle.

    How about I believe in the unlucky ones?

    by BenderRodriguez on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 11:43:12 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site