Skip to main content

So, the Republican-lead congress has authorized a lawsuit against the White House for using executive action in delaying parts of the Affordable Care Act.  The Republicans contend that the president has overstepped his constitutional authority and has failed to faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress.

The American tax-payers will foot the bill for filing and prosecuting this lawsuit.  Whether or not you agree with suing the president, you are paying for this legal action.  Interestingly, the American tax-payers will also foot the bill for defending themselves against the lawsuit.  Regardless of your like or dislike of the president, you will be paying the costs of defending the president from the lawsuit.

Let us also remember that currently, the federal government spends more money than it takes in from tax revenue.  This means the federal government will need to borrow the money both to prosecute the lawsuit, and to defend against it.  Republicans like to claim that they are the party of responsible government spending, and that any new government expenditures must be offset by cuts in other federal spending.  Remarkably, in discussions prior to the vote authorizing the lawsuit, at no point did any Republican law-maker raise the issue of the costs of the lawsuit, or how those costs would be paid, or what programs will be cut to offset the expense of the lawsuit.

I suggest we should be asking House Republicans to explain to the American people the advantages of increasing the federal deficit and borrowing money from lenders like China in order to pay lawyers to sue ourselves.  I myself would like to hear their explanation for this.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site