Skip to main content

The news that the IMF is calling for higher taxes on coal, natural gas, diesel, and gasoline has only just started to make the rounds (so no full posts yet) but it already has the deniers excited with "we told you so" glee.

To them, this is verification that greens are evil neo-luddites who want to enjoy the wealth and luxury of electricity while denying it to the poor the world over.

While IMF chief, Christine Lagarde, says, "we are generally talking about smarter taxes rather than higher taxes," of course all the deniers hear is "taxes." They obviously aren't going to want to mention the fact that these taxes would reduce deaths from fossil fuels pollution by 63%!

We're sure to see a Lomborg oped, Heartland press release, and WUWT post shortly.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  IMF = greens (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FG, Wee Mama, elwior

    I haven't seen anything from the climate change denier crowd on this yet though the report came out last week.  Anyone opposed to new taxes should know that energy taxes can be made revenue neutral by cutting other taxes like income taxes that they dislike.

    I'm more interested in what the anti-IMF crowd thinks of this.  Doesn't really fit their caricature of the IMF.

    Cynicism is what passes for insight among the mediocre.

    by Sky Net on Mon Aug 04, 2014 at 07:20:59 AM PDT

    •  Except that cutting Income Taxes (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      and boosting energy taxes is solidly regressive, but other than that.....
      If you want this to be revenue fair, use the additional revenue to subsidize heating & cooling and energy conservation technology for lower income people.

      If I ran this circus, things would be DIFFERENT!

      by CwV on Mon Aug 04, 2014 at 09:49:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  A carbon tax won't hurt the poor (0+ / 0-)

    The popular myth with climate deniers is that a carbon tax will hurt the poor the most as they need cheap energy. The reality is that it's the rich that waste the most energy by flying to far away resorts, driving big cars and heating up or cooling their big houses.

    The motto for the future should therefore not be more and discardable, but less and sustainable.

Click here for the mobile view of the site