Skip to main content

At my website, I’ve discussed on a number of occasions some of the differences between conservative and liberal philosophies. I do so with the understanding that the differences both extend beyond and have as foundations psychological bases which themselves are structurally different. Biology starts us off from different places emotionally and psychologically. From there, our experiences and relationships add to the mix. We’ve passed “complex” and have now moved into whatever comes after that.

The broader argument is that ideological differences between right and left have psychological roots: stability and hierarchy generally provide reassurance and structure, whereas change and equality imply greater chaos and unpredictability.

[W]e consider evidence for and against the hypotheses that political conservatism is significantly associated with (1) mental rigidity and closed-mindedness, including (a) increased dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity, (b) decreased cognitive complexity, (c) decreased openness to experience, (d) uncertainty avoidance, (e) personal needs for order and structure, and (f) need for cognitive closure; (2) lowered self-esteem; (3) fear, anger, and aggression; (4) pessimism, disgust, and contempt; (5) loss prevention; (6) fear of death; (7) threat arising from social and economic deprivation; and (8) threat to the stability of the social system. We have argued that these motives are in fact related to one another psychologically, and our motivated social–cognitive perspective helps to integrate them….
Our review of the evidence indicates that there is consistent and relatively strong support for the general hypothesis that a specific set of social–cognitive motives are significantly related to political conservatism. Almost all of our specific hypotheses were corroborated. (links/citations in the original)

At first glance, at least of the view characteristics listed above seem rather harsh and not especially complimentary. It’s understandable that some would push back against those findings and/or suggestions. Surely many would argue that these are not attributes which can be applied to all conservatives in all instances. That’s no doubt true.

But when considered in the context of political behavior, notably among those on the far-right, the descriptions above certainly find ample confirmations in a wide variety of actions and policy proposals. Mother Nature is a difficult foe to combat.

The point here is not to criticize or condemn those for whom these psychological traits clearly find a home. A hope [ever the idealist!] is that recognition of these descriptions in some of their own actions may offer at least some conservatives the chance to examine the value and benefits of their actions with an eye toward changes they might consider more advantageous to them personally.

It’s also important for those of us on the left side of the divide to at least recognize that some of what drives conservative thought and policy is part of their inherent makeup. That doesn’t eliminate responsibility for the consequences of their actions. But it does open up the possibility that in our dealings with them, added insights and information about what makes them tick might help us find different ways of sharing our own motivations in ways that resonate more clearly with their own.

From there, it may be a shorter step to allow for better, more meaningful, and ultimately more mutually beneficial dialogue. That might even be a good thing!

Given the ever-widening divide and the dimmer prospects for finding methods to bridge our differences and work together rather than in opposition, every little bit of added knowledge and perspective can only help. The challenges we face in the years to come won’t go away, nor will they shift into neutral while we iron out our differences in order to find solutions and adaptations.

The sooner we deepen our understandings of the complex and inter-related motivations of the human psyche as they apply to our political differences, the sooner we can put an end to the bomb-throwing and begin working to a more prosperous and mutually beneficial future for us now, and for our children later.

We could do worse….

SOURCE: Dana R. Carney, John T. Jost, Samuel D. Gosling, and Jeff Potter, "The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind," Political Psychology 29 (2008): 807-40

** SOURCE: Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition by John T. Jost Stanford University; Arie W. Kruglanski University of Maryland at College Park; Jack Glaser University of California, Berkeley; Frank J. Sulloway University of California, Berkeley.
Psychological Bulletin Copyright 2003 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2003, Vol. 129, No. 3, 339–375


Top Comments Submission Made Easy
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Cool diary (0+ / 0-)

    Are your sources available online by chance?  I'd love to dive deeper.

    Our Dime: Understanding the Federal Budget

    by Dustin Mineau on Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 07:13:04 AM PDT

  •  Three questions (0+ / 0-)

    1) Obama's administration is arguably more conservative in many ways than was Nixon's. If so, does this imply that both his administration and his supporters are developing more of these characteristics?
    2) Cross culturally, it's arguable that Europe's left is much less conservative than "the left" in the US. Do your findings imply that the US Leftists manifest more of these characteristics than the European Leftists?
    3)Historically, it is arguable that the Left of the sixties and seventies was less conservative than the left of today. Do your findings imply that the current left is developing more of these characteristics?

    You should be careful psychologizing. What seems black and white in a narrow context when viewed through a broader lens might  just bite one's political ass.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site