Skip to main content

A new study in the journal Social Science Research argues that a significant shift in GOP support for environmental concerns occurred after the fall of the Soviet Union.

The study is based on the League of Conservation Voter's annual report cards from 1970 through 2013 tracking politicians' positions on environmental issues. Mother Jones has a write-up on the findings with illuminating graphs clearly depicting a partisan split in both the Senate and House beginning in the early 1990s. Until then, while Republicans were still less concerned about the environment than Democrats, the two parties were much more closely aligned.

This makes sense when you realize some deniers have conflated environmental concern with Communism, like James Delingpole in his book, "Watermelons: The Green Movement's True Colors" (green on the outside, red on the inside).

Grist has a slightly different, much more controversial take—suggesting that the GOP started "hating green" when the environmental movement "started helping blacks" through regulations intended to reduce environmental impacts on minority and low income communities.

In either case, the study provides further evidence that Republican denial has less to do with the state of the science and more to do with political ideology.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site