Skip to main content

Very grateful to Paul Hogarth for the reminder: The Senate is voting on the first step in a repeal of Citizens United on Monday, and a polite, personal note is always more effective than a petition.

Especially a note which points out the political advantages in supporting a measure approved by 9 out of 10 voters.

Following is my letter to my senators. While cutting and pasting is not advised, a similar message to yours might make them pause and consider the advantages of voting yes on Joint Resolution 19.

Dear Senator:

This coming Monday, September 8, the full Senate will vote on Joint Resolution 19, the first step in the process of passing a constitutional amendment to repeal the Citizens United decision and limit corporate spending on political campaigns.

In October, 2012, Bannon Communications Research did a poll which found a stunning 89% of Americans agreeing that there is too much big money in politics. Solid majorities of Democrats, Republicans and Independents, self-declared liberals, moderates and conservatives said they supported changing the way corporations are involved in campaign financing.

It’s pretty rare when 9 out of 10 of your constituents, whoever they are, agree on something. There is absolutely no political risk and lots of political gain in voting for Joint Resolution 19. It’‘s a perfect example of doing well by doing good.

In fairness, I should warn you that there is political risk in NOT voting for the resolution. Opposing a measure supported by nearly 90% of Americans is the sort of thing that gets noticed, after all.

Thanks for listening, and looking forward to seeing your “aye” on Monday.

Yours,

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site