MQ-9 Reaper drone.
Tom Englehardt writes
The Senate Drone Report of 2019: Looking Back on Washington's War on Terror. An excerpt:
It was December 6, 2019, three years into a sagging Clinton presidency and a bitterly divided Congress. That day, the 500-page executive summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s long fought-over, much-delayed, heavily redacted report on the secret CIA drone wars and other American air campaigns in the 18-year-long war on terror was finally released. That day, committee chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) took to the Senate floor, amid the warnings of his Republican colleagues that its release might “inflame” America’s enemies leading to violence across the Greater Middle East, and said:
“Over the past couple of weeks, I have gone through a great deal of introspection about whether to delay the release of this report to a later time. We are clearly in a period of turmoil and instability in many parts of the world. Unfortunately, that's going to continue for the foreseeable future, whether this report is released or not. There may never be the 'right' time to release it. The instability we see today will not be resolved in months or years. But this report is too important to shelve indefinitely. The simple fact is that the drone and air campaigns we have launched and pursued these last 18 years have proven to be a stain on our values and on our history.”
Though it was a Friday afternoon, normally a dead zone for media attention, the response was instant and stunning. As had happened five years earlier with the committee’s similarly fought-over report on torture, it became a 24/7 media event. The “revelations” from the report poured out to a stunned nation. There were the CIA’s own figures on the hundreds of children in the backlands of Pakistan and Yemen killed by drone strikes against “terrorists” and “militants.”
There were the “double-tap strikes” in which drones returned after initial attacks to go after rescuers of those buried in rubble or to take out the funerals of those previously slain. There were the CIA’s own statistics on the stunning numbers of unknown villagers killed for every significant and known figure targeted and finally taken out (1,147 dead in Pakistan for 41 men specifically targeted). There were the unexpected internal Agency discussions of the imprecision of the robotic weapons always publicly hailed as “surgically precise” (and also of the weakness of much of the intelligence that led them to their targets).
There was the joking and commonplace use of dehumanizing language (“bug splat” for those killed) by the teams directing the drones. There were the “signature strikes,” or the targeting of groups of young men of military age about whom nothing specifically was known, and of course there was the raging argument that ensued in the media over the “effectiveness” of it all (including various emails from CIA officials admitting that drone campaigns in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Yemen had proven to be mechanisms not so much for destroying terrorists as for creating new ones). [...]
But while all of that created headlines, the main debate was over the “effectiveness” of the White House’s and CIA’s drone campaigns. […]
Blast from the Past. At Daily Kos on this date in 2011—There's no great mystery: Tim Tebow is a great athlete:
The traditional media are agog over professional football player Tim Tebow. After he quarterbacked his team to another late comeback victory last week, the ESPN website's headline blared: How does he do it? The implication was that Tebow's athletic success somehow is unusual or surprising, and because Tebow very publicly displays his deep religious beliefs, his success on the field somehow makes him a miracle worker, if not himself a miracle.
Strange as it is, Tebow's religious beliefs have become the most prominent aspect of the reporting and commentary on his success at winning football games, and given how publicly and ostentatiously he flaunts those beliefs, that's obviously by intentional design. People love him for it or hate him for it.
Strange as it is, many in the traditional media hype Tebow's overt religious devotion as correlative if not causal of his athletic success, but the traditional media in this country seem to have a reflexive need to infuse religion into just about everything, so they must consider Tebow their very special gift. But stepping back from the hyperbolic shrill, all it takes is a quick perusal of the careers and lives of some other talented and successful athletes to reveal something more obvious working where some prefer to see their interpretations of intimations of the divine.
Tweet of the Day
Of course Republicans respect Putin. He tanked an economy, started an illegal war, and hates gays.
— @SkepticPugilist
On
today's Kagro in the Morning show, we somehow allow ourselves to get caught up in the weird Sony/North Korea/
The Interview story, even though we don't have any real idea what's going on.
Greg Dworkin willingly went along for a bit, then ran through his top APR headlines, focusing heavily on Cuba. Side note to the bizarre Sony story: Did Iran hack Sheldon Adelson? Hey, St. Louis cops didn't shoot this guy. Correction from yesterday, re: impeachment penalties. Plus, the 19th century impeachment case that could have saved us heartache in 1974. NYC police union leader invites discussion, let's say, on the confusion about and amongst cops, citizens, and our rights.
High Impact Posts. Top Comments