Wait, isn't Joe supposed to be Mr. Honest, unlike some other candidates? He first sold himself as less hawkish, and admitted his initial opposition to the raid which ended the evil terrorist Osama Bin Laden, who murdered 3000 Americans. Now, he's trying to rewrite history:
In that meeting, Biden had suggested more surveillance was needed before a raid was launched, but today Biden said he told the president privately that he supported the raid after the meeting concluded.
....
This tracks differently from how the vice president described the decision in years past when he publicly admitted he opposed the raid that resulted in the al Qaeda founder's death.
"He got to me. He said, 'Joe, what do you think?' And I said, 'You know, I didn't know we had so many economists around the table.' I said, 'We owe the man a direct answer. Mr. President, my suggestion is, don't go. We have to do two more things to see if he's there," Biden recalled in 2012.
Nice try, Joe. You can't
hide. No, you have no constituency. You don't have the doves or the hawks. You don't have the economic left or even the economic right to Hillary (except on TPP, which even the leading Republican opposes). Unlike other candidates, including Bush I and Gore, you did not start an exploratory committee early in the year before the election year. Make up your damn mind, or stop fucking with us already. Piss or get off the pot!!! Stop making Fred Thompson look proactive.
Oh yea: one of our candidates was always for the raid, back when it happened, and stands by it today. Not you, Joe.