Bill Clinton and his entourage disrupted voting at three precincts causing delays of up to two hours when Clinton entered polling places to chat and even have his picture taken with voters. Local authorities said Clinton broke no laws, but given that is true his behavior did not sit well with those of us who like our elections fair, democratic, and above suspicion.
Early on the Democratic establishment attempted to deprive the Sanders campaign of voter data based on the actions of one staffer, Josh Uretsky, who viewed data leaked by software company NGP VAN. And then we learned the DNC and NGP VAN recommended the Sanders campaign hire Uretsky.
The DNC continues to use the undemocratic superdelegates to weight the vote heavily toward Clinton.
After all these questionable actions there is no reason voters should trust in the good intentions of the DNC or the Clinton campaign.
The biggest opportunity for election fraud comes through the Diebold and other touchscreen voting machines. Brad Friedman, Bev Harris, Greg Palast and others have documented vote rigging on touch screen electronic voting machines with no reliable verifiable paper ballots. Many of you may recall the odd vote flipping and hundred percent voter turnout incidents during the Kerry/Bush election of 2004, as well as, the hanging chads in Florida during the 2000 presidential campaign that gave us the Supreme Court selection of George W. Bush. Claims of discrepancies (read vote stealing) during hotly contested elections are NOT conspiracy theories.
bradblog.com/...
It is just good practice—NOT conspiracy theory--for voters to take screen shots of their polling place computers at the close of the voting day—both during primaries and general elections. It is every voter’s right. And it is one of the few ways available to document election fraud.