The last question from the report (April 27, 2016):
Watching the two candidates last night, it’s clear that Clinton is doing all she can to pivot to November, while Trump is still stuck fighting for the GOP nomination.
Both, however, have got serious work to do post-primary to heal the rifts and strains created by these tough primary contests. Clinton, as I wrote last week, is finishing the primary season in worse shape than when she started.
Polling taken last June by NBC/Wall Street Journal found her with an overall net positive rating among all voters of +4 (44 percent positive to 40 percent negative) and a +77 score among Democrats (84 percent positive to 7 percent negative).
The most recent April NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, however, had her overall approval ratings deep underwater at -24 (32 percent positive to 56 percent negative), and her ratings among Democrats dropped as well from +77 to +46. Among all Sanders voters, she’s at -1 (40 to 41 percent).
This suggests that Clinton will have some work to do to get Sanders supporters on board the Clinton train this fall. How and when Sanders helps with this is also going to be critically important.
However, the rift on the GOP side is deeper and more complicated for Trump to heal. While 78 percent of Democrats said they could “see themselves supporting” Clinton for President, just 61 percent of Republicans feel similarly about Trump. Among all Republicans, 36 percent said they’d be “dissatisfied” if Trump is the nominee - including 27 percent who said they’d be very dissatisfied. Among Democrats, 27 percent said they’d be dissatisfied with Clinton. Most of the anti-Trump sentiment is concentrated among Kasich voters (73 dissatisfied), college educated GOPers (55 percent dissatisfied) and those in higher income bracket (43 percent dissatisfied). This is why Trump’s attack last night on Hillary for playing the “woman card” is a misguided strategy that only plays into his weaknesses.
Talk to GOP strategists, even those who are not Trump fans, and they’ll tell you that Clinton has serious problems with women voters - especially in key swing states. But, her path to victory is going to come in - and from - suburban voters - those who are college educated, higher income and more socially moderate. These are the voters already wary of Trump. Attacking Hillary as a “woman” who is only winning because of her gender is not the way to win them back.
— emphasis added
So there is good news and some not so good news happening.
Without any further input from me on the numbers cited in the report regarding party unity at the presidential level, where for the first time in 50 years the U.S. will hold the first presidential election without the full protections of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, there exists an option that is rarely chosen but one that could 1) help neutralize the worst effects of the nationwide GOP voter disenfranchisement/voter purging agenda and 2) for securing a Dem majority in the Senate, increasing the odds for re-taking the House, and winning many more down ballot races...
According to polling of voters on both sides of the aisle, uniting the Democratic party to its strongest front, would indicate that a move to the center is not the best strategy. Beltway pundits and establishment gurus generally agree that the nation is more polarized, but to what degree and over which issues, there is a divide between what everyday people care about and the issues the D.C. power brokers have in mind.
Iow’s, maintaining and adopting a platform to the left of the spectrum and sticking to it may prove to be the best move in these times
More from the Cook Political Report on the 2016 Presidential Primaries and Caucuses April 27, 2016
While this next graphic is not unexpected at election season with so much at stake, we Dems could choose a different path this year and break with the norm of heading to the center for the general election and on down the ballot where feasable
Hillary Clinton has shown an especially steep decline over the past month.
Example: Instead of moves like this — Senate Democrats join House in trying to slow down Obama administration effort to reduce drug prices — how about more of this type of change as just one of many — Marijuana legalization could also be pursued as something that would add to the strength of a Dems campaign too
Overall, a quarter of the public now expresses unfavorable opinions of both political parties. This is driven in part by the growing share of Republicans and Republican leaners who view the GOP negatively, and by the overwhelming shares in both parties who view the opposing party unfavorably.
The share holding negative views of both parties is higher today than in previous presidential election years.
In 2012, 18% viewed both parties unfavorably and in 2000, just 7% had unfavorable opinions of both the Republican and Democratic parties.
As the party of the people, it is not enough to be considered less unfavorable than the GOP. We could halt the negatives and work to increase our favorability as viewed in the eyes of all Americans by demanding better policies. Use today’s polarization to garner a more committed, engaged electorate. Spread a winning strategy where it is really needed and where the fit is good — to every down ballot race in the country.
So why this line of thinking? What’s the point in pushing the issue?
RedMap (more than gerrymandering — a firewall of sorts), 2010 teabag republican wave, 2014 loss of senate (Overall, the elections resulted in the largest Republican majority in the entire country in nearly a century, with 54 seats in the Senate, 247 (56.78%) in the House, 31 governorships (62%), and 68 state legislative chambers. Moreover, Republicans gained their largest majority in the House since 1928, the largest majority in Congress overall since 1928, and the largest majority of state legislatures since 1928), and a mixture of doubt about a 2016 landslide for Dems.
With the massive amount of cash behind the “conservative” movement and the plutocrats firmly in control ready to “invest” much more, it remains true that people have not recognized enough of the changes promised by Dems we elect to stop the ever widening wealth gap, protect our right to vote, reign in our police, guarantee equal justice to all, end the perpetual wars, protect a woman’s right to privacy and her reproductive future, LGBT community from assault, undocumented immigrant families from being torn apart, and too many more problems so massive they are becoming almost invisible as they become the norm
And one more thing about 2014:
The result was the most partisan, nationalized, and president-centered midterm election in at least 60 years
“Most partisan”…nationalized”... “president-centered” — that was 2014...and now? whew..
that’s it — time to turn in