Honestly, you knew this was coming. If you’re drawing that Venn diagram of who is available to give an accurate ruling on anything Trump-related, you need to make all those circles 50 percent smaller.
To defend real estate mogul Donald Trump‘s claim that a federal judge is biased against him because of his “Mexican heritage,” his campaign spokeswoman argued on Monday that it also would be acceptable to accuse a female judge of bias on the basis of gender.
So, Trump has made it clear that it’s perfectly fine to exclude people legally on the basis of race, religion, and sex. That pretty much covers it.
But why? Why would Latinos be against Trump? Well, there’s the wall. And why would Muslims be against Trump? That would be the ban. And why would women be against Trump?
That would be because he’s a misogynistic ass.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, in criticizing Trump’s attacks, predicted that he could also target female judges.
“I imagine he’ll move on to women judges because he’s been insulting women so regularly, or maybe a judge with a disability, or perhaps one who was a former POW, or African American,” she told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Monday evening. “This is dangerous nonsense that undermines the rule of law, that makes him appear to be someone who has no respect for fellow Americans, and I think it is yet more evidence why this man is dangerous and divisive and disqualified from being president.”
According to Donnie Trump, there’s only one person who can judge Trump. And it sure isn’t God. That guy is clearly biased.