Incredible to watch liberals try to impose a sumptuary law on Obama just 3 months out of office. https://t.co/CwNSkOTdTn via @voxdotcom— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
Incredible to watch liberals try to impose a sumptuary law on Obama just 3 months out of office. https://t.co/CwNSkOTdTn via @voxdotcom
.@voxdotcom Equally incredible that the people making this argument seem totally unaware of the obvious racial dimensions of the case they're making.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom Equally incredible that the people making this argument seem totally unaware of the obvious racial dimensions of the case they're making.
.@voxdotcom The argument is that Obama should "raise his ethical game" by restraining his consumption in deference to the rising tide of populist anger. pic.twitter.com/mbbkheQhcl— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom The argument is that Obama should "raise his ethical game" by restraining his consumption in deference to the rising tide of populist anger. pic.twitter.com/mbbkheQhcl
.@voxdotcom But that "populist outrage," as we all know (or should) is fueled by angry white people resentful of the loss of privilege. Yes?— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom But that "populist outrage," as we all know (or should) is fueled by angry white people resentful of the loss of privilege. Yes?
.@voxdotcom Most amazing policy shift of 2016: watching Trump bury 3 decades of GOP free market apologetics now that white people are the ones hurting.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom Most amazing policy shift of 2016: watching Trump bury 3 decades of GOP free market apologetics now that white people are the ones hurting.
.@voxdotcom And Bernie's "populist outrage"? Much of it driven by the new vulnerabilities of college-educated whites in the new global economy.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom And Bernie's "populist outrage"? Much of it driven by the new vulnerabilities of college-educated whites in the new global economy.
.@voxdotcom So: Shape up, Obama! Show moral leadership! In deference to the newly discovered sensitivities of economically vulnerable white people. OK. pic.twitter.com/4AB1sc7m6Y— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom So: Shape up, Obama! Show moral leadership! In deference to the newly discovered sensitivities of economically vulnerable white people. OK. pic.twitter.com/4AB1sc7m6Y
.@voxdotcom That seems both deeply dishonest & remarkably condescending. And look: this hazing has set in before he has even made his first speech. pic.twitter.com/iDZj9qNfs4— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom That seems both deeply dishonest & remarkably condescending. And look: this hazing has set in before he has even made his first speech. pic.twitter.com/iDZj9qNfs4
.@voxdotcom I can't escape the feeling that this is the beginning of a bad time on the left, full of avoidable misunderstandings - like this one.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom I can't escape the feeling that this is the beginning of a bad time on the left, full of avoidable misunderstandings - like this one.
.@voxdotcom Not a good look to haze our black First Family on their way out of office in deference to "populist outrage" of dispossessed whites.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom Not a good look to haze our black First Family on their way out of office in deference to "populist outrage" of dispossessed whites.
.@voxdotcom Actually the hypocrisy of that is so obvious and so bizarre I can't believe it won't cause real racial conflict in the Democratic Party.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom Actually the hypocrisy of that is so obvious and so bizarre I can't believe it won't cause real racial conflict in the Democratic Party.
.@voxdotcom Barack Obama was not wealthy before he came into office. I have no problem with him becoming wealthy when he leaves - he should do that.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom Barack Obama was not wealthy before he came into office. I have no problem with him becoming wealthy when he leaves - he should do that.
.@voxdotcom And he will be judged, as most wealthy people are judged, by the way he uses his money & his influence to promote the greater good.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom And he will be judged, as most wealthy people are judged, by the way he uses his money & his influence to promote the greater good.
YES!
.@voxdotcom That is a story that will play out over years, but all over the left today, it's knives out already, in a weirdly condescending way.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom That is a story that will play out over years, but all over the left today, it's knives out already, in a weirdly condescending way.
PREACH!
.@voxdotcom Stop telling Barack Obama not to get rich because angry white people don't like that. Really. It's a bad look. Just knock it off. Fim.— Elliott Lusztig (@ezlusztig) April 26, 2017
.@voxdotcom Stop telling Barack Obama not to get rich because angry white people don't like that. Really. It's a bad look. Just knock it off. Fim.
I have no idea who this guy is. I just agree 100% with what he said. People are quick to assume the worst of a man they claim to admire. Get a grip and let him make some money. I, for one, can’t wait to see how he’ll use it.