NYT: You know it’s publish the any old tripe time when the Israeli Palestinian conflict heats up yet again.
Now who do you turn to?
There must be a neoconservative ready to spout his foreign policy fantasies based upon some assumption of his political dislikes are somehow meaningful. Ping: Up pops Bret Stephens.
How do I know we are entering neo-con fantasia, why the title of course.
If the Left Got Its Wish for Israel [Link to article]
An opinion piece not even remotely based upon reality is now the NYT’s go to during an all too real conflict?
Jesus H Christ that is a low bar indeed.
He writes:
Imagine an alternative universe in which an enlightened Israeli government did almost everything progressive America demanded of it.
That was the highlight, it goes downhill from there into a neo-con’s flight of perverted imagination.
Take today’s tortuous reality and impose a delusional insta-fix, then gloat how it would not work.
Fucking brilliant. No wonder the NYT dropped the title Op-Eds and went for using plain Opinion.
After eight years of Neo-con foreign policy we are still trying to clean up the disaster 13 years on.
Yeah right, what a jerk, another worthless opinion.