A highly individualistic level, often with a lot of anger in it. Can be seen in the ‘terrible two’s’ and rebellious teenage behaviour. Also evident in macho street violence later in life. Core values here include power, immediate gratification, escaping from being controlled, being respected and avoiding shame. [emphasis mine.].
Now, here are some caveats of this paradigm:
- No level should be seen as ‘better’ or ‘worse’ than any other level
- People operate out of the level where they get answers to life’s problems.
- Each level enfolds and incorporates all the levels that precede it
It should be noted that no one is a level, or at a level. We tend to operate in a center of gravity in and around a level. You may want to look at the above links and peruse the other levels. You, the reader, likely operate, but not exclusively, between the 4th and 7th level. And again, “no level should be seen as ‘better or ‘worse’ than any other level.”
This final caveat is essential in our understanding of Trump:
- Up to and including level 4, it is very difficult to see (and above all appreciate the value in) any level beyond the one you are currently at. [emphasis mine]
What does that last caveat mean? Well, the 4th level is described in its simplest terms as:
Strong sense of right vs. wrong, good vs. bad and the need for order in society. In cultural terms, judicial systems develop at this level. Fundamentalist religious beliefs are seen here too. Core values include justice, security and morality. Also a desire to control impulsivity and “evil” deeds. Can be seen in movements such as “right to life” and “moral majority”.
People operating at each level and be malicious, or benign. People operating at the 3rd level can even be spontaneous and joyful. The Robin Williams character in Mrs. Doubtfire comes to mind, in the beginning of the film, when he does what he likes, and the kids love him, to hell with consequences, until Sally Field is so fed up that she divorces him. Sally is tired of operating at the 4th level - in this case, being the “bad cop” ― in response to his actions. Robin, in turn, had up to that point been unable to “see (and above all appreciate the value in)” that 4th level, the one beyond where he was at the time. Of course, during the rest of the movie, he was able to change and grow.
The 3rd level, though, is also where we find bullies. And that’s where Trump comes in.
Trump, operating in the 3rd level, has a very difficult time seeing, and above all appreciating the value, of a strong sense of “right vs. wrong, good vs. bad,” etc. He can pretend to be at level 4, in calling for law and order, and playing to the religious right, but he, at his core, operates at the 3rd level. Remember that people operating at the 3rd level need to be respected and, at all cost, to avoid shame.
Trump, as fits someone in that third level of consciousness, has no use for existing rules. He wants to makes his own rules: sexually assault women with impunity, because he’s a star; ban Muslims; build walls; torture; kill the relatives of terrorists; ban newspapers; make it easier to sue people who say bad things about him — and the last one is key, because calling him on his behavior brings shame. And when he is caught, that’s when he experiences the biggest shame. Humiliation is his biggest fear. So what does he do? He has to attack. He has to defend. He has to sue the New York Times. He has to be right.
It is this last part that compels him to react to any and all criticism almost immediately. That’s why he MUST tweet. Sometimes at 3 in the morning. He can’t help it. He must defend himself, mostly by attacking, because the best defense is often offense, and when he can’t refute someone, he will attack their credibility (Did you hear that the Khans are actually Radical Muslim Terrorists? And those women are all liars. The election is rigged. I saw all that on the internet, so it must be true.). He cannot stand to be laughed at, or shamed, or disrespected.
That’s why he lies — he has to change the truth in order to be right. That’s why he lies so casually, so matter-of-factly. Because facts don’t matter anymore. Because calling him out, admitting that he is wrong, catching him in a lie — brings shame. So, in his mind, he never said the things he said, because if they were wrong, those things could not have been said by him. He has to convince you of that.
Someone wrote, way back in the beginning of the primary season, that Trump brands himself as a winner, and that the way he will fade into oblivion is to lose. When he starts to lose primaries, the line of reasoning went, he would fade into oblivion. Well, it hasn’t happened yet. And, because he can’t be wrong, he was already pre-framing the November election as rigged, as far back as July, so that when he loses, he will not have really lost. And his followers need to believe that this is true.
If you understand Gravesian Pyschology, and Spiral Dynamics, Trump’s behavior is predictable. The more you understand the 3rd level of human consciousness, the more glaringly obvious and predictable he behavior becomes.
And, the more predictable the behavior of his supporters becomes.
I started this writing about Trump’s supporters. Every such attack on Trump also offends his supporters. They take it personally. They rush to Trump’s defense, and they really don’t care one whit what people say about him. Facts don’t matter. Feelings do.
[David Frum as a never-Trumper has become my favorite neocon in that his understanding of Trump, even back then, was more astute than others. He wrote a prescient article in the Atlantic in July, 2016]
David Frum, noted Republican, wrote in The Atlantic over the summer , "Why Trump Supporters Think He'll Win." In it, he synthesizes “conversations I’ve had, and the insights I’ve gleaned, presented in the voice of an imagined Trump supporter.”
“Tom Kean/Tim Kaine? So, so sorry we got the name of your latest precious progressive New South governor a little mixed up. Just kidding: not even a little bit sorry. What you need to take on board is how profoundly so many Americans do not give a … oh yeah, you still live in a contry where people don’t use language like that when they talk about politics. Come visit Reddit sometime and see how the other half lives. But I’ll spare your feelings. They like that Donald doesn’t know any of that sh …. Oops. Sorry again….
"You Acela people live in a beautiful country where everything works. You believe in institutions because they work for you. So it bothers you that Donald doesn’t seem to know what the OECD does or who’s in charge of the FDIC. But our people don’t believe in institutions any more. The institutions they do still care about—the military and the cops—you use for props when you need them, and as dumping grounds when you don’t.
Facts don’t matter. The feelings, however, are visceral.
Trump’s followers have such intense feelings of anger, they are so “mad as hell” that they are “not going to take it anymore,” that they willfully hate those whom Trump hates, and hold in contempt those of us who may challenge the supremacy of The Donald.
They don’t care about consequences, either. They get so worked up by what Trump says, that they just want to get rid of the status quo, regardless of consequences, regardless of what comes next. They are like those who voted for Brexit in the UK. They don't give a shit about facts. Facts no longer matter.
We think facts matter. They don’t. Facts only matter when we give them a meaning, and that meaning determines how we feel. How we feel determines the decisions we make. To Trump supporters, facts don’t matter. Feelings do. In fact, without emotions, we are incapable of having feelings, and from making any decisions at all. The Khans resonate with us, because the fact that a Muslim American died in combat is meaningless compared to the feelings generated by the image of the grieving parents, and of his father taking his copy of the Constitution from his pocket.
[You may remember the grieving Khan family at the 2016 convention.
Jonah Lehrer, below, has been somewhat discredited, but his reference to Antonio Demasio, below, is accurate]
Jonah Lehrer discussed this on NPR’s "Fresh Air" a number of years ago:
…. I think one of the best examples of this comes from the work of a neurologist named Antonio Demasio, who in the early 1980s was studying patients who, because of a brain tumor, lost the ability to experience their emotions. So they didn't feel the everyday feelings of fear and pleasure. And you'd think, if you were Plato, that these people would be philosopher-kings, that they would be perfectly rational creatures, they'd make the best set of decisions possible. And instead, what you find is that they are like me in the cereal aisle, that they're pathologically indecisive, that they would spend all day trying to figure out where to eat lunch.
They'd spend five hours choosing between a blue pen or a black pen or a red pen, that all these everyday decisions we take for granted, they couldn't make. And that's because they were missing these subtle, visceral signals that were telling them to just choose the black pen or to eat the tuna fish sandwich or whatever. And then when we're cut off from these emotional signals, the most basic decisions become all but impossible.
We all make decisions based on how we feel. How we feel comes from emotions, not facts, except to the extent that the facts can generate or validate emotions, like fear.
Frum touches also on the feelings of emasculation that these men feel.
“…. In your America, you worry about how there aren’t enough women making Hollywood films or sitting on corporate boards. In our America, the gender gap closed a long time ago—and then went into reverse. Obama in the Oval Office was humiliating enough. But Hillary will be worse: We’re going to lose any idea at all that leadership is a man’s job.
“You’ve been building up to this for a long time. No more Superheroes rescuing women in the movies. The girl always has to throw the last punch herself. In the commercials, Dad’s either an idiot—or he’s doing the housework with his boyfriend.”
Compare this to The Salon article from a couple of years ago, “Inside the terrifying, twisted online world of involuntary celibates.” It starts:
In a recent post on Love-shy.com, a forum for the dateless and sexless, the man wrote, “I am seriously thinking about just getting a gun and shooting everything up,” he said. “I fantasize about it everyday … that’s how fucked up my mind is.” The truly “fucked up” thing is that this isn’t another newly discovered online posting from Elliot Rodger, the 22-year-old who went on a shooting rampage Friday, killing six people. These are just the words of yet another angry man on the Internet expressing rage at society — especially women — over his own celibacy.
[...]
To be sure, this poster isn’t representative of male virgins, just as Elliot Rodger isn’t the spokesperson for all men who identify as “involuntarily celibate” (“incels” for short). But sympathy for Rodger, and strikingly similar ideologies, are disturbingly common in the online communities for “love-shy” and incel men. PUA Hate, the site where Rodger shared his resentment about being a self-described incel has been taken down amid the current media frenzy, but plenty of similar sites remain.
On the blog That Incel Blogger, the author says of Rodger’s massacre:
“What happened is punishment for evil and violence of feminists and liberals….”
We can talk facts, and spout statistics and economic data about sexism, but the facts don’t matter. The feeling of emasculation is real. Sometimes, tragically, sometimes it leads young men to want to go out in a blaze of glory just to show that they were here on the planet, to gain a semblance of significance, as Elliot Rodger and others have done. Sometimes, it leads people to Authority figures who pretend to have the answers, and who both tap into and feed the fuel of fear and hatred that comes from this feeling of emasculation. Sometimes it’s what gets students, just this past week, to join Facebook hate groups and get expelled from high school for it (as if that will stop them from hating). And, sometimes, it’s what gets "Crusaders" to decide that they want to blow up a Kansas mosque. It's why his supporters openly talk about rebellion and assassination. We laugh at poor white men, with guns and explosives, at our own peril.
The license plate motto of Quebec is "Je me souviens." It means "I remember." I worked with a Canadian teacher when I was a school teacher, many years ago, who would tell his students that he would give grief to his Québecois relatives.
"You remember?" he would say. "Remember what?" "I remember before the English came." "No you don't!" he would reply. "That was hundreds of years ago. You can't possibly remember that!" "I remember," his Québecois relatives would answer, "that it was better than it is now."
Of course they didn't remember that. The same idea, though, "that it was better than it is now" is what flocks people to want to "make America great again. As if it was better before.
Every other day or so, it seems that another Republican, Neo-Con or not, is either criticizing Trump or announcing for Clinton, as his campaign implodes.
[It was imploding, until Comey’s “October Surprise.”]
But for those supporting Trump, they don't care that Establishment Republicans endorse Hillary. To them, that just confirms what they already know.
For the rest of us, for whom facts matter, and who want competence, and want sober leaders who are predictable, we will support Hillary.
Even if some of us have to hold our nose in order to vote. Because the alternative is unfathomable.
[We discovered this. The alternative was and is unfathomable. You can substitute Biden for Hillary, and attempts to use his age, and now his support of Israel against him.]
Facts cannot overcome feelings. Bringing facts to attempt to sway most Trump supporters is like bringing a speech to a knife fight.
And that’s why while attacks on Trump hurt him personally — which is why he must tweet to every slight and taunt — they don’t seem to hurt him with his base. That’s why attacks, taunts, and self-inflicted wounds that would destroy other candidates, don’t hurt him. Because his supporters want that kind of Authoritarian leader, that strong father figure, to lead them out of the politically correct world of equal opportunity and feminism. It’s why he is willing to tear down the Republican Party, and, indeed, the entire fabric of our democracy, with him as he, himself, crashes and burns. He may be left with just his base. But that base is not going away on November 9th.
[Or November 6th. We also know that his base intimidates and is capable of physically threatening and attacking Trump’s opponents — and, of course, tragically, the Capitol itself.]
Where does this lead us? First, we are not going to convince these threatened, emasculated males to vote for Hillary. They are a part of our nation, and they will still be here after the election. But after the election, we are going to have to live with them, and recognize who they are — not as evil cretins, of course — but as scared and scarred. As Frum’s composite notes:
I bet you don’t own a gun. I bet you’ve never had a DUI either. So it wouldn’t worry youthat you could lose the first if you get the second. But it worries our voters. Their lives are kind of messed up. They get into trouble. That’s why they want guns for themselves, and not just for Mayor Bloomberg’s bodyguards.
A friend of mine, well versed in Gravesian psychology, reminded me that if this group of people lose the election (and even, God forbid, if they win, as Trump will not actually improve their conditions), “the anger remains. And the level of anger is dangerous.”
How do we receive their anger without feeling contempt for them? Without ridiculing them as backward redneck/hillbillies? How do we acknowledge the reality of their anger while at the same time understanding that it is misplaced? If we laugh at them, and hold them in contempt, we just perpetuate, and exacerbate, the situation.
[Some foreshadowing of January 6th….]
They will be here on November 9th. They will be angry. They will be armed. They will be dangerous. And we will have to understand who they are, that their anger is real, and that their grievances are real, too, at least to them.
A shift in tone is required. “Until we receive their anger,” my friend continued, “there is no possibility of meeting the genuine unmet needs that they are feeling. Even if they don’t know quite what those needs are yet. And that’s a fact.”
Most people here on DK, I notice, don’t care about Trump supporters, or why they feel as they do. We ignore them, we ridicule them, and write of them with contempt. We do so at our own peril, and at our nation’s peril.
[I wrote these words 8 years ago. It is not to late to see them as human beings who have grievances, real or imagined. It’s not too late to stop ridiculing them or writing of them with contempt. It might be too late for that to make any kind of difference. I don’t know if anything short of prison will stop Trump or his supporters. And we can’t count on that….]