It is well-known that Roberts recently ruled that a (very) young woman should be arrested etc. for eating a French fry at a Washington D.C. metro station, see, e.g., "D.C. Circuit Judge Gets on Supreme Court Short List" at
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1108389946956 ,
"In the unanimous ruling last October in Hedgepeth v. WMATA, Roberts upheld the arrest, handcuffing and detention of a 12-year-old girl for eating a single french fry inside a D.C. Metrorail station. "No one is very happy about the events that led to this litigation," Roberts acknowledged in the decision, but he ruled that nothing the police did violated the girl's Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment rights."
It should not be rocket science for somebody to label this as the "Freedom Fry Incident" or something and make Roberts look like the abusive, repressive bully of children that he may well be.
"Freedom Fry vs. Repressive Roberts"...now there's a talking point.