Dubya gets one jeer and no cheers in today's Washington Post' opinion page.
The first editorial is about the Kerry and Edwards. The third editorial is about a proposed gun control law in Maryland.
The second editorial bashs Dubya's policy towards Haiti. "Once again a poor nation with strong ties to the United States is in desperate trouble -- and once again, the response of the Bush administration is to backpedal away, forswear all responsibility and leave any rescue to others....[T]he Bush administration would rather leave the answers to Caricom or the United Nations or France. It's an inexcusable abdication."
Harold Meyerson has a piece about how Edwards stump speech mentioning those in poverty is a discussion of a topic that the Democrats have avoided for the last twenty years. It is mainly about Kerry and Edwards, but ends with "What Kerry, Edwards and the new Democratic mainstream are advocating is a kind of majoritarian progressivism -- using government to defend the interests of the broad nation at a time when both globalized capitalism and George W. Bush reward chiefly the rich."
Maura Keefe has a positive profile of Dean. Richard Cohen has a positive profile of Edwards. David Broder points out that the Democratic nominee will be a Senator and that being a Senator doesn't resonate with the voters for President, "who rightly suspect that a body with 100 members is not the best place to develop executive management skills or demonstrate national leadership."