This NY Times articles has some choice snippets from the piles of files so far released about Bush's Supreme Court nominee, John G. Roberts.
He has some odd views like it's ok for states to be racist:
He defended, for instance, the constitutionality of proposed legislation to restrict the ability of federal courts to order busing to desegregate schools.
And more...
Here's an interesting way of sidestepping the 1st amendment:
Judge Roberts, now on the federal court of appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, also argued that Congress had the constitutional power "to divest the lower federal courts of jurisdiction over school prayer cases."
However he feels about abortion, he might argue that Roe v. Wade should be overturned because it was a bad legal precedent:
... in October 1981, he attended a conference at the American Enterprise Institute on judicial power and observed that most of the participants "recognized a serious problem in the current exercise of judicial power" as illustrated "by what is broadly perceived to be the unprincipled jurisprudence of Roe v. Wade."
You can read the details for yourself, and there will be more, but I think it's contributing to a trend of not being in line with the kind of country we'd like to build.