So, this is how conservative "professionals" behave--mocking the death of a woman and completely misrepresenting her beliefs and values by calling her a "terror advocate." To be a terrorist is to have no regard for human life. That does not describe why Rachel Corrie faced down a bulldozer--unarmed.
But I can well imagine the Wall Street Journal's justification for calling her a "terror advocate": She was obstructing action against terrorists. (Nevermind that she was trying to stop the destruction of Palestinian homes in Gaza, something some may call terrorism in itself.)
If obstruction, then, defines a "terror advocate", then let it be known that George Bush is a terror advocate for distracting us from a war on the terrorists.