From yahoo!
The federal panel reviewing the Sept. 11 attacks has scheduled interviews with former President Clinton and former Vice President Al Gore this month but is struggling to get similar cooperation from President Bush and administration officials.
Members of the bipartisan commission said they were considering a subpoena to force the public testimony of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice . She has declined to appear at the panel's two-day hearing later this month.
"The commission wants to go back in the court of public opinion and appeal to the administration for them to reconsider their first stand," said commissioner Timothy Roemer, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. "If we don't get that kind of cooperation, compelling Dr. Rice to come before us is an option."
The White House said Tuesday that Rice's testimony was a constitutional issue of separation of powers. "As a matter of law and practice, White House staff have not testified before legislative bodies," National Security Council spokesman Sean McCormack said. "This is not a matter of Dr. Rice's preferences."
Wow, the crapmeter just went into orbit with McCormack's statement.
What I, as an American, want to see, is simply this: Clinton and Gore should be declaring that they will speak publicly if desired, and regardless, IT WILL BE UNDER OATH. I think it's baloney that current Administration Officials would be allowed to speak to the Commission without being under Oath as a standard of the expectation of honesty and accuracy.
Clinton, Gore, McAuliffe, somebody should be saying this, now.