http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/10/politics/10PANE.html
Bush was warned of aircraft and Bin Laden. The only question now is what did he know and when did he know it. Let the impeachment begin. Pressure congress, Kerry, in the very least this is criminal negligence. A felony not a misdemeanor. He was warned and let it happen. He stood by and let the enemy attack innocents. Now we need answers: Why did NORAD stand down that day? A military is the ultimate monopoly, the buck stops at the top, the commander in chief. NORAD can't fail unless the chain is broken, at the top, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers. Why was WTC 7 destroyed with explosives as Silverstein has now admitted. Explosives? Was it pre rigged? Why did the FBI stifle the investigation of the "20th" hijacker? Why did Atta recieve a 100,000 dollar wire transfer from a man tied to the Pakistani ISI. Why was the same ISI chief, General Mahmood, in Washington at the time of the attack. Why can't Theodore Wilson tell us under oath what his wife said to him in the phone calls, and, if she connected via cell phone or called "collect." Simple question, no straight answer will make you a suspect in any crime. We have state of the art forensics and world class investigators in this country, and, yet we can't investigate an event that Bush equated to "Pearl Harbor."
Having foreknowledge and not acting in good faith to protect the citizens in and of itself is impeachable and indefensible. In the very least criminal negligence.