stax
I'm not talking about Fox's actual 'debate', that portion needs little explanation. Heck, the state's own party pulled out of the forum. As other bloggers have already noted, it was the usual Fox lovefest where the candidates pretty much got to give their stump speech with little challenge from the 'moderator' Wallace. I'm talking about the panel of 30 'undecided' New Hampshire voters they went to after the 'debate' for some 'real peoples'' opinions.
The Grinch stole Christmas from all the Who's down in Whoville, that's how the story goes. More recently, however, by an Executive Order signed on July 17th entitled "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq" the Grinch could've just gotten himself elected President, made vague statements about the threats those Who's posed to national security and seized their property. But that's silly... right?
Ok, technically the headline is Rice rejects talks with Iran, Syria on Iraq, but the principle is there. And please read all the way through, the end is the scariest.
I know people don't like to hear about 2008 before the new legislative session has even started. Tough luck. I love Wesley Clark, I loved him in 2004, I loved him in my first blog post here. As I explained previously his military experience, popularity in Arkansas, and general intelligence make him a fantastic candidate in my opinion. Follow me below the fold to watch me waiting with baited breath for that wonderful announcement...
Poll 229 votes Show Results Should Clark run? Yes, and win Yes, and be the vice presidential nominee Yes, but only to move the debate No 229 votes Vote Now! Should Clark run? Yes, and win 201 votes Yes, and be the vice presidential nominee 8% 18 votes Yes, but only to move the debate 1% 2 votes No 3% 8 votes
Upload logo
Choose a logo image in .gif, .jpg, or .png format.
Delete logo
Choose File