One of the things that has really left me puzzled in the health care debate (besides the obvious problem of there being a large segment of the population that gleefully believes whatever scary nonsense Glenn Beck spews that day) is the controversy surrounding the public option. The reason I'm puzzled is that it seems obvious that it's a really good idea (unless you're the CEO of Aetna or someone similar, but not that many people fit in that category). After all, the public option lowers costs and expands the choices available to the public. Almost certainly, the private insurance options available on the market will improve quickly and substantially if they have to compete with a public plan. Really... what's not to like?
So why is the public option an obstacle, instead of being one of the chief selling points for health care reform?
Read More