Those D.C. forces under Barr's command are concealing their identities and some Democrats are fuming

Daily Kos Staff Emeritus

Thursday June 04, 2020 · 9:14 AM PDT

2020/06/04 · 09:14

Protestors take a knee and raise their hands as they face riot police near the White House on June 1, 2020 as demonstrations against George Floyd's death continue. - Police fired tear gas outside the White House late Sunday as anti-racism protestors again took to the streets to voice fury at police brutality, and major US cities were put under curfew to suppress rioting.With the Trump administration branding instigators of six nights of rioting as domestic terrorists, there were more confrontations between protestors and police and fresh outbreaks of looting. Local US leaders appealed to citizens to give constructive outlet to their rage over the death of an unarmed black man in Minneapolis, while night-time curfews were imposed in cities including Washington, Los Angeles and Houston. (Photo by ROBERTO SCHMIDT / AFP) (Photo by ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images) — Protesters take a knee and raise their hands as they face riot police near the White House on June 1, 2020, as demonstrations against George Floyd's murder continue.

If you’ve spent time in some parts of the world at certain periods—say Latin America—you’re familiar with the sight of so many armed people in uniform on the streets to keep authoritarian regimes in place. And even though the presence of such forces was often bolstered by U.S. policy, seeing such an array in the U.S. capital is incredibly rare. And discomfiting. In the past few days, however, as Devlin Barrett reports, Attorney General Bill Barr has overseen a motley assortment of police, agents from numerous federal agencies including the Bureau of Prisons, and the National Guard to “dominate” the situation with thousands of people in the streets protesting the death of George Floyd and other Black Americans at the hands of police in cities across the nation.

We got a whiff of what kind of action such forces can be expected to engage in under Barr’s orders when they cleared the area around Lafayette Square Monday with flash-bangs and tear gas ahead of Donald Trump’s walk from the White House to St. John’s Church, where he brandished a Bible in what the White House grotesquely called a “leadership moment” similar to Winston Churchill’s inspection of damage in London from the Nazi blitz during World War II. That show of force would be disturbing enough, as critics including Trump’s former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis have made clear, but some of those in uniform have either covered their badge numbers or are wearing outfits with no discernible insignia or individual identification. My colleague Kerry Eleveld reported on one such group Wednesday. No matter how officials try to justify this, the covering up of one’s identity has only one true purpose: to keep dissenters from identifying individuals who engage in brutality or otherwise step over the boundaries of acceptable law enforcement tactics so that accountability can be avoided.

Some of those on the front line were identified Wednesday as Special Operations Response Teams from the Bureau of Prisons, trained especially to handle inmate riots. No word on how much training they have received on handling protests outside prisons. Some Washington, D.C. metro police officers reportedly have taped over their badge numbers, a practice outlawed in some locales because of widespread abuses in the 1960s.

Ryan J. Reilly and Tara Golshan at HuffPo repor t that Michael Bromwich, the former inspector general of the Justice Department who oversaw internal investigations, said when federal law enforcement officers conceal their identities: “It completely undermines the ability to hold law enforcement personnel who engage in misconduct accountable. You’ve got to know who they are, and certainly which agency they represent.”

In a 2014 letter to Ferguson, Missouri police chief Thomas Jackson, Department of Justice official Christy Lopez wrote:

Officers wearing name plates while in uniform is a basic component of transparency and accountability. It is a near-universal requirement of sound policing practices and required under some state laws. Allowing officers to remain anonymous when they interact with the public contributes to mistrust and undermines accountability. The failure to wear name plates conveys a message to community members that, through anonymity, officers may seek to act with impunity. Further, the lack of name plates makes it difficult or impossible for members of the public to identify officers if they engage in misconduct, or for police departments to hold them accountable.

Some Democrats are vowing to stop this practice:

We cannot tolerate an American secret police.

I will be introducing legislation to require uniformed federal officers performing any domestic security duties to clearly identify what military branch or agency they represent. pic.twitter.com/2kaFAlWUow
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) June 4, 2020

In addition, Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton of Washington, D.C. and Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia are drafting legislation mandating that all uniformed federal law enforcement officers clearly show their names and agencies when on duty at protests protected by the First Amendment. That wouldn’t affect the National Guard or undercover officers. Beyer told the HuffPo reporters: “When you can’t tell who people are, then there is no accountability at all. You can go out and bust any heads you want to because who is going to hold you accountable if you are anonymous—especially with the big face masks.”

This content was created by a Daily Kos Community member.

Make YOUR voice heard!

Those D.C. forces under Barr's command are concealing their identities and some Democrats are fuming

Comments are closed on this story.