Here's an excerpt from the article, the complete version of which is at:
It was published on 6/11/03.
"The stunning news prompted FBI Director Robert Mueller to admit that some of the hijackers may have stolen identities of innocent citizens. In September 2002, Mueller told CNN twice that there is "no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers." After that admission a strange thing happened - nothing. No follow-up stories. No follow-up questions. There was dead silence and the story disappeared. It was almost as if no one wanted to know what had happened. In fact, the FBI didn't bother to change the names, backgrounds or photographs of the alleged 19 hijackers. It didn't even deny the news reports suggesting that the names and identities of at least six of the hijackers may be unknown. Mueller just left the door open."
What an admission.
So the FBI really doesn't know anything about who the hijackers really were (or "are"). There is no way to positively identify any of the hijackers. No credible records, no credible paper trails. No nothing, says Mueller, who headed the Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATIONS.
Think about that for a second.
Nearly every time a talk show host, probably all of the right wingers and most of the progressives, mentions the story of 9-11, the 19 hijackers are almost always part of what's mentioned. If on film or television, we see the 19 pictures. But the FBI says that there's no way to positively identify any of them.
In other words, it's a story. It's a made-up narrative. It's the most acceptable explanation for what happened, universally repeated in the national and local media, and it's not true. It's a lie that's perpetuated every hour of every day. Perhaps a good portion of the 300 million dollars newly budgeted for disinformation by the Bushies is hush money. The FBI says it's not true. The hijackers who are still alive say it's not true.
Yet politicians, publishers, producers, and the news directors, all of them, continue to repeat the lie, and they'll likely continue to repeat the lie until there is no truth left. The only way that they can survive, now, is to make the lie the truth, because they're all terrified of the consequences of telling the truth. If the truth comes out, it won't be a comfortable situation for them.
Always, the same pictures are released. The media doesn't question it, the commentators don't question it, the political structure won't question it. Nothing about the vacuum of knowledge about the identity of the hijackers resides in the mainstream national dialog.
Why not? How can an editor NOT want to investigate this issue, and simply follow the logic where it MUST go. Put another way, what is preventing this story from being investigated, brought to the public forum, and discussed?
Since it took only hours after the crashes to post the 19 mug shots, it must logically follow that the pictures were deliberately and intentionally released by the FBI. Verifying their information didn't matter, because they had already calculated that the US public would be receptive to the official framing, no matter how many times the lateral explosions on the towers were replayed.
Years of research already gave way to reframing tactics so skillfully employed that nary a question is raised by sedentary consumers. It's THESE nineteen hijackers. Let's not confuse the issue.
And even though it's common knowledge that at least some "hijackers" are still alive, the FBI never admitted it on the MSM. They never retracted their news release, never apologized to any of the surviving hijackers. Since the printing of the above article, they haven't announced that they erred in printing the pictures. They don't want the dominant narrative to change. Because if it does, everything else changes.