Freedom posted a bit about Michael Moore, which reminded me I hadn't looked at his site for a while either.
So I go to take a look, and I find a link to an article about Captain America.
Seems that Marvel is portraying Captain America as being sympathetic to terrorists, or at least less antagonistic than in the past. Of course, this article is from National Review, which is a bit... er.. conservative.
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-medved040403.asp
A couple of excerpts, in case you didn't want to go linking away...
In other words, Marvel Comics thoughtlessly recycles a notion that's been lovingly nurtured by anti-American conspiracy theorists of all stripes: that our own intelligence establishment somehow orchestrated bloody terrorist attacks against U.S. civilians.
Anti-American conspiracy theorists... right... Medved goes on to say...
We might expect such blame-America logic from Hollywood activists, academic apologists, or the angry protesters who regularly fill the streets of European capitals (and many major American cities). When such sentiments turn up, however, hidden within star-spangled, nostalgic packaging of comic books aimed at kids, we need to confront the deep cultural malaise afflicting the nation on the eve of war.
Whichever way you care to look at it, Captain America has certainly changed.
Max Allan Collins... praises Marvel for its edgy content. He cites the determination to "take this classic character of a simpler time into the smoky aftermath of September 11th" and "this story's courage and ability to examine the complexities of the issues that accompany terrorism... specifically, not to duck the things America has done to feed the attacks."