Kos comes up with some great core values for our movement, though I feel that some of them are too left wing for my taste (as a good-old-fashioned liberal) and some of them are just bad politics. However, I don't want to argue with many of them-- only one. When he states "no regulation of morality," I think that he misses some important ideas. This isn't an attack, merely a constructive criticism from someone who cares about the progressive community.
I think that the statement "no regulation of morality" is far too broad. No one wants hookers running around, sexually oriented businesses wreak havoc on the communities that surround them, hard drug trafficking, gambling and other immoral activities create serious problems for the community. What you seem to imply is that you don't want a narrow and particular version of morality forced on you when another view could be equally beneficial.
Rather than stating it as a negative and as a broad concept, make it positive and specific. Say "promotion of a public morality based on basic community values and an empowering sense of right and wrong." Essentially no drugs, hookers, rampant sexualization or out-of-control gambling, etc. because these violate the fundamental values of the American community (family, temperance, modesty and work) and they disempower us (they are addictive, dangerous, destructive to communities and prone to provoke violence).
The highest goal of a free society must be the perpetuation of virtue. Virtue without freedom is morally useless and freedom without virtue is libertinism and vice. We must come together to decide those values which we all share-- regardless of our background-- and which will serve to make our country a better place to live.