Too bad I can't find where the founding fathers explicitly worked into the constitution
a provision that if the presidency is ever decided by the SCOTUS that said president
could never appoint a SC justice.
Roberts should be asked about Bush V. Gore 2000.
Time to remember that after the dust settled, Gore won FLA ( Text copy of old AP story here:
http://www.factormyth.com/VoteScam/GoreWonFLA%20Associated%20Press.htm )
Also, Roberts worked with the Bushes on the 2000 election aftermath, as did Bolton. See how they are both being rewarded?
Even without that in The Constitution explicitly, such an appointed president this imperial right-wing appointment is simply unacceptable.
Roe is sucking all the air from other, perhaps more illuminating issuses
- Imperial presidency
- Corporate rule
- Fascism
- TORTURE
- Patriot act
The OVERREACH of these folks continues,
Roberts:
- Is very young (for a justice)
- Has Stealthy history of not writing.
- Has mostly served corporations & the Republican Party - not exactly working for WE THE PEOPLE
Therefore he is simply unacceptable.
I plan to write further about how the reality based community must hold clear & high standards & regain our just voice.