Someone was trying to convince me of the absurdity that 9/11 was an inside job and since I had trouble making ends meet, I figured people at this site would be better at making the counterarguments. So if for those who have already tied the loose ends together, can you please tell me what the counter arguments are for:
- How it's possible that the Pentagon could be hit despite having anti-aircraft missiles and having an airforce base next door and despite all of the urgent warnings that an attack within the US was imminent AND that at 8:16 it was known that a plane had been hijacked. Not to mention Norman Pinetta's testimony of Cheney barking that the orders still stand. Let alone that the flight path of that plane maneuvered in such a way as to be virtually impossible by even an ace pilot..
more below...
- How is it conceivable that the professional security people around Bush would allow him to operate on the assumption that the first crash was an accident?
- What is the flash of yellow light that is seen coming out of the tip of the nose of the first plane a split second before it hits the wall?
- How did the plane that hit the Pentagon go through several layers of reinforced concrete when the tip of a plane is made of very fragile material?
- How come the core of the towers were not still standing?
- How come the Bush team was so sure that he and the school were not a target even though the country was under attack?
- How is it possible that 5 days after 9/11 thermal sattelite images showed extreme heat? The kerosene jet fuel could not possibly have generated that much heat.
If you vote False then please reconcile all of these points.